ubl — archive

Re: [ubl] Re: AW: UBL schema tests

From: Anne Hendry
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 19:44:00 -0000

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

ubl message

Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: AW: UBL schema tests

From: Anne Hendry <[email protected]>
To: Lisa-Aeon <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 12:02:51 -0800

Hi Lisa,

Good question as to minutes.  I took some notes but expected the final 
definitive would come with the final version of the  ndr doc.  Is that 
available?  I haven't seen it.  The only one I have is dated 24 
February.  I did take some rudimentary notes on this part of the 
discussion, if you can glean from this:

...
code lists shcmea: secton 3.7 of ndr defines rules for code list.
develop ss with unspecialized and unspecialized dts.
here would like to get concensus.
need rep term qualifier - need 57 rep term qualifiers for sdts.
no, only for code lists.
St: need to make names from code lists, not from codes.
replacing prefix with name that begins with rep term qualifier.
J: in lcs bin?  Tim: yes.
A: only for 12?  MD: must be done for all datatypes.
ST; no, could just do for codes; only need one dt for ones [codes] we 
don't use.
MD/TM/SG: work out in next 24 hours.

MC: this was Sue and Stig.
MD: ok, used namespce prefix as rep term qualifier
MC: for specialized dt.
...

So, in the end, what I now recall is that there was a bit of a standoff 
between whether or not we needed to have something for all the codes or 
just the 12, and Michael was to work this out with Tim and Stephen 
(lcsc).  I think Michael was on the edge of agreeing to go with 
Tim/Stephen's suggestion of only having 12 dts (the ones for the codes 
we specify) and using the same (only one) prefix for all the others.  Is 
this what would preclude the need for the specialized cl module?

To hopefully help this process I've attached the graphic that we were 
using at the f2f.  May not be the final version after all the tweaks 
from Mark based on conversations, but pretty much the same, and we are 
currently talking about the two lower-right boxes contained in the lower 
(blue/green) half of the diagram.

-Anne

Lisa-Aeon wrote:

>Stephen,
>You were not able to see the drawing Mark had for us at the Face to FAce,
>but it included a Code List Schema Module.  We need to be aligned here, if
>there are decisions made, do we have minutes or something from the meetings
>so that we can see what happened and why?
>
>What I have attached is just the external modules part of his drawing, saved
>as a BMP, hopefully you can open and see it.  I am confused, I guess because
>I missed so much of the meeting.
>
>Lisa
>
>