ubl — archive

[Anne Hendry]

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->




















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: AW: UBL schema tests




From: Anne Hendry <anne.hendry@sun.com>
To: anne.hendry@sun.com
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 12:10:08 -0800






Forgot to attach the diagram...

Anne Hendry wrote:

> Hi Lisa,
>
> Good question as to minutes.  I took some notes but expected the final 
> definitive would come with the final version of the  ndr doc.  Is that 
> available?  I haven't seen it.  The only one I have is dated 24 
> February.  I did take some rudimentary notes on this part of the 
> discussion, if you can glean from this:
>
> ...
> code lists shcmea: secton 3.7 of ndr defines rules for code list.
> develop ss with unspecialized and unspecialized dts.
> here would like to get concensus.
> need rep term qualifier - need 57 rep term qualifiers for sdts.
> no, only for code lists.
> St: need to make names from code lists, not from codes.
> replacing prefix with name that begins with rep term qualifier.
> J: in lcs bin?  Tim: yes.
> A: only for 12?  MD: must be done for all datatypes.
> ST; no, could just do for codes; only need one dt for ones [codes] we 
> don't use.
> MD/TM/SG: work out in next 24 hours.
>
> MC: this was Sue and Stig.
> MD: ok, used namespce prefix as rep term qualifier
> MC: for specialized dt.
> ...
>
> So, in the end, what I now recall is that there was a bit of a 
> standoff between whether or not we needed to have something for all 
> the codes or just the 12, and Michael was to work this out with Tim 
> and Stephen (lcsc).  I think Michael was on the edge of agreeing to go 
> with Tim/Stephen's suggestion of only having 12 dts (the ones for the 
> codes we specify) and using the same (only one) prefix for all the 
> others.  Is this what would preclude the need for the specialized cl 
> module?
>
> To hopefully help this process I've attached the graphic that we were 
> using at the f2f.  May not be the final version after all the tweaks 
> from Mark based on conversations, but pretty much the same, and we are 
> currently talking about the two lower-right boxes contained in the 
> lower (blue/green) half of the diagram.
>
> -Anne
>
> Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>
>> Stephen,
>> You were not able to see the drawing Mark had for us at the Face to 
>> FAce,
>> but it included a Code List Schema Module.  We need to be aligned 
>> here, if
>> there are decisions made, do we have minutes or something from the 
>> meetings
>> so that we can see what happened and why?
>>
>> What I have attached is just the external modules part of his 
>> drawing, saved
>> as a BMP, hopefully you can open and see it.  I am confused, I guess 
>> because
>> I missed so much of the meeting.
>>
>> Lisa
>>
>>