ubl — archive

Re: [ubl] Re: AW: UBL schema tests

From: Stephen Green
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 20:01:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->



















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: AW: UBL schema tests




From: "Stephen Green" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:13:37 -0000






Anne and All

Yes, you've emphasised that it was agreed that we'd just have 12 specialised
code DT's but at that stage I personally didn't anticipate all the
enumerations in the one
module as we have at the moment. This seems OK to me *But*:-
a) it means, in my view, virtually no need for the separate schema modules
to still exist
b) if we did insist on 12 separate schema modules I'd expect these to
contain the
enumerations rather than the one sdt module (I think this was the gist of
the diagram
Mark drew up in Washington).
c) I prefer a) with the enumerations altogether and a dropping altogether of
the separate one-module-per-codelist modules but there may be some good in
having b) with each
set of enumerations in a single module (it gives the opportunity for the
namespace
use for codelist details and perhaps version control and may help
maintenance of the
codelists - e.g. to update the version of the ISO currency codelist as
currencies change).
d) what we now have is worst of both worlds, IMHO.

Steve