ubl — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [ubl] BBIE Property Type Naming AI
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->ubl message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] BBIE Property Type Naming AI
- From: Tim McGrath <[email protected]>
- To: Grimley Michael J NPRI <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:59:11 +0800
|
I am not sure why we ned to say "unqualified
ccts:BasicBusinessInformationEntityProperty" and "qualified
ccts:BasicBusinessInformationEntityProperty". isn't the whole idea of having a thing called ccts:BasicBusinessInformationEntityProperty meant to distinguish it from a ccts:BasicBusinessInformationEntity? what makes a ccts:BasicBusinessInformationEntityProperty is that it is unqualified (it is a ccts:BasicBusinessInformationEntity without the qualifier part of the name). i would expect that is we are creating a CBC for re-usable types then all ccts:BasicBusinessInformationEntityProperty should be in thier even if they are only used with qualification in the documents and aggregations. in answer to your question about how many definitions are needed - a quick sort shows about 20-30 fall into this category. Grimley Michael J NPRI wrote:
|