| 00002 |
Re: How to create an XML weekly calendar |
Dimitre Novatchev
|
2005-01-31 17:19 |
| 00025 |
Constraints for nested elements; key and keyref |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-01 09:39 |
| 00013 |
Re: [xml-dev] Constraints for nested elements; key and keyref |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-01 09:48 |
| 00006 |
Re: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system |
Oleg Paraschenko
|
2005-02-01 12:26 |
| 00009 |
What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Roger L. Costello
|
2005-02-01 12:35 |
| 00010 |
Re: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system |
Oleg Paraschenko
|
2005-02-01 12:36 |
| 00026 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-01 12:46 |
| 00022 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Roger L. Costello
|
2005-02-01 13:05 |
| 00028 |
Re: Re: [xml-dev] Constraints for nested elements; key and keyref |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-01 13:36 |
| 00020 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Roger L. Costello
|
2005-02-01 14:05 |
| 00008 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-01 14:28 |
| 00011 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-01 14:33 |
| 00027 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Roger L. Costello
|
2005-02-01 14:39 |
| 00021 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-01 14:51 |
| 00023 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Michael Champion
|
2005-02-01 14:53 |
| 00024 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-01 15:00 |
| 00012 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-01 15:15 |
| 00007 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Jeff Greif
|
2005-02-01 15:46 |
| 00014 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-01 16:49 |
| 00005 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-01 18:19 |
| 00019 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-01 18:30 |
| 00015 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-01 18:38 |
| 00001 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2005-02-01 18:43 |
| 00003 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-01 19:00 |
| 00004 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-01 19:13 |
| 00000 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-01 19:18 |
| 00016 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2005-02-01 19:28 |
| 00018 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Joseph Mayer
|
2005-02-01 19:59 |
| 00017 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: 3 XML Design Principles [T2005013101A6] |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-01 20:08 |
| 00081 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Nathan Young
|
2005-02-01 20:31 |
| 00095 |
CFP: XML, OSCON 2005 |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2005-02-01 21:49 |
| 00052 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-01 22:41 |
| 00037 |
Re: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system [T2005020100AK] |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-02 00:21 |
| 00038 |
RE: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system [T2005020100AK] |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-02 03:55 |
| 00051 |
Re: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Chris Burdess
|
2005-02-02 09:27 |
| 00096 |
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March |
Alan Gutierrez
|
2005-02-02 14:25 |
| 00079 |
Re: XSLT Reuse (Was: Even if you're not ... (Was: If you're going to the W3C meeting in March)) |
Alan Gutierrez
|
2005-02-02 14:36 |
| 00094 |
Re: [xml-dev] Constraints for nested elements; key and keyref |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-02 14:39 |
| 00083 |
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-02 15:08 |
| 00068 |
Re: XSLT Reuse (Was: Even if you're not ... (Was: If you're going to the W3C meeting in March)) |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2005-02-02 15:08 |
| 00056 |
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March |
Alan Gutierrez
|
2005-02-02 15:57 |
| 00116 |
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2005-02-02 16:12 |
| 00125 |
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March |
Alan Gutierrez
|
2005-02-02 16:25 |
| 00126 |
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March |
Alan Gutierrez
|
2005-02-02 16:33 |
| 00115 |
Re: [xml-dev] Recommend A Java-XML Forum |
Alan Gutierrez
|
2005-02-02 17:26 |
| 00058 |
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] [T2005020100MS] |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-02 18:03 |
| 00067 |
RE: [xml-dev] Recommend A Java-XML Forum |
Joe Mayer
|
2005-02-02 19:42 |
| 00054 |
ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.4 |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2005-02-02 22:59 |
| 00069 |
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March [T2005020200AU] |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-02 23:10 |
| 00053 |
RE: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March [T2005020200AU] |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-02 23:23 |
| 00071 |
Re: [xml-dev] Recommend A Java-XML Forum [T2005020200BW] |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-02 23:59 |
| 00127 |
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March [T2005020200AU] |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-03 00:26 |
| 00113 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Bill de hÓra
|
2005-02-03 12:09 |
| 00128 |
RE: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March [T2005020200AU] |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-03 12:26 |
| 00055 |
RE: [xml-dev] Recommend A Java-XML Forum [T2005020200F1] |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-03 14:39 |
| 00066 |
The BBC, Mozilla.org, and Microsoft to provide keynote speakers f or XTECH 2005 --registration now open |
Elledge, Marion
|
2005-02-03 16:18 |
| 00057 |
Re: [xml-dev] 3 XML Design Principles |
Norman Walsh
|
2005-02-03 20:21 |
| 00092 |
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March |
Norman Walsh
|
2005-02-03 20:25 |
| 00084 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Miles Sabin
|
2005-02-03 22:31 |
| 00039 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-03 22:45 |
| 00049 |
RE: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-03 23:26 |
| 00040 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-03 23:50 |
| 00093 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-04 00:48 |
| 00114 |
xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-04 03:13 |
| 00070 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-04 05:12 |
| 00080 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-04 14:05 |
| 00097 |
typing with XML Schema |
Ho-Kuo Chan
|
2005-02-04 14:32 |
| 00122 |
RE: [xml-dev] typing with XML Schema |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-04 14:48 |
| 00107 |
Re: [xml-dev] typing with XML Schema |
Ho-Kuo Chan
|
2005-02-04 15:06 |
| 00050 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-04 15:18 |
| 00059 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Liam Quin
|
2005-02-04 15:48 |
| 00077 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Rich Salz
|
2005-02-04 15:54 |
| 00076 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Norman Walsh
|
2005-02-04 15:56 |
| 00061 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
David Carlisle
|
2005-02-04 15:59 |
| 00082 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-04 16:06 |
| 00105 |
Re: [xml-dev] typing with XML Schema |
Ho-Kuo Chan
|
2005-02-04 16:07 |
| 00110 |
IT Manager Survey Finds 59% Of UK Businesses Are Now Using XML |
Kurt Cagle
|
2005-02-04 16:17 |
| 00123 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Toni Uusitalo
|
2005-02-04 16:19 |
| 00121 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Karl Waclawek
|
2005-02-04 16:35 |
| 00034 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Toni Uusitalo
|
2005-02-04 17:10 |
| 00043 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Norman Walsh
|
2005-02-04 17:25 |
| 00099 |
RE: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Toni Uusitalo
|
2005-02-04 17:33 |
| 00091 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-04 17:39 |
| 00089 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Liam Quin
|
2005-02-04 18:23 |
| 00100 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Toni Uusitalo
|
2005-02-04 20:20 |
| 00042 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Amelia A Lewis
|
2005-02-04 20:48 |
| 00036 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Jeff Rafter
|
2005-02-04 20:57 |
| 00044 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-04 21:04 |
| 00031 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-04 21:07 |
| 00048 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2005-02-04 21:17 |
| 00029 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Toni Uusitalo
|
2005-02-04 21:24 |
| 00087 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-04 21:29 |
| 00102 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2005-02-04 21:36 |
| 00103 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-04 21:47 |
| 00086 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Amelia A Lewis
|
2005-02-04 21:49 |
| 00033 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2005-02-04 21:53 |
| 00035 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-04 22:04 |
| 00041 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Amelia A Lewis
|
2005-02-04 22:23 |
| 00111 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Christian Nentwich
|
2005-02-04 22:31 |
| 00118 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2005-02-04 22:38 |
| 00075 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? [T2005020400A5] |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-04 22:43 |
| 00062 |
Re: [xml-dev] typing with XML Schema [T2005020400AD] |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-04 22:45 |
| 00072 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-04 22:56 |
| 00119 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-04 23:13 |
| 00109 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-04 23:16 |
| 00124 |
Re: [xml-dev] IT Manager Survey Finds 59% Of UK Businesses Are Now Using XML |
Kurt Cagle
|
2005-02-04 23:32 |
| 00106 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-05 00:02 |
| 00064 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-05 01:44 |
| 00073 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Rich Salz
|
2005-02-05 01:48 |
| 00120 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-05 01:50 |
| 00074 |
OASIS TC Call for Participation: OASIS SOA-RM TC |
James Bryce Clark
|
2005-02-05 02:18 |
| 00112 |
How simple is simple enough? - was Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Michael Champion
|
2005-02-05 03:59 |
| 00063 |
RE: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-05 10:20 |
| 00078 |
RE: [xml-dev] IT Manager Survey Finds 59% Of UK Businesses Are Now Using XML |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-05 10:25 |
| 00060 |
RE: [xml-dev] IT Manager Survey Finds 59% Of UK Businesses Are Now Using XML |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-05 10:31 |
| 00104 |
RE: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-05 10:36 |
| 00085 |
Re: [xml-dev] typing with XML Schema |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-05 11:59 |
| 00046 |
Re: [xml-dev] How simple is simple enough? - was Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-05 12:25 |
| 00045 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-05 14:03 |
| 00065 |
Re: [xml-dev] IT Manager Survey Finds 59% Of UK Businesses Are Now Using XML |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-05 15:00 |
| 00108 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-05 19:09 |
| 00047 |
Re: [xml-dev] How simple is simple enough? - was Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Bjoern Hoehrmann
|
2005-02-05 19:36 |
| 00030 |
The Myth of Explicit Relationships [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Roger L. Costello
|
2005-02-05 20:11 |
| 00117 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-05 20:51 |
| 00088 |
Re: [xml-dev] The Myth of Explicit Relationships [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Frank Manola
|
2005-02-05 21:42 |
| 00101 |
Re: [xml-dev] The Myth of Explicit Relationships [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Ian Graham
|
2005-02-05 22:09 |
| 00090 |
Re: [xml-dev] The Myth of Explicit Relationships [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-05 22:48 |
| 00032 |
Re: [xml-dev] IT Manager Survey Finds 59% Of UK Businesses Are Now Using XML |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-06 04:14 |
| 00181 |
Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2005-02-06 15:47 |
| 00195 |
Re: [xml-dev] The Myth of Explicit Relationships [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Liam Quin
|
2005-02-06 17:30 |
| 00152 |
Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Michael Champion
|
2005-02-06 17:51 |
| 00137 |
Re: [xml-dev] How simple is simple enough? - was Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Michael Champion
|
2005-02-06 17:58 |
| 00138 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Rich Salz
|
2005-02-06 18:02 |
| 00151 |
Re: [xml-dev] The Myth of Explicit Relationships [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] |
Kurt Cagle
|
2005-02-06 18:27 |
| 00196 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Kurt Cagle
|
2005-02-06 18:52 |
| 00179 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Dave Pawson
|
2005-02-06 21:13 |
| 00194 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-06 21:33 |
| 00183 |
RE: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Derek Denny-Brown
|
2005-02-07 00:00 |
| 00168 |
RE: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-07 01:14 |
| 00156 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Kenneth Stephen
|
2005-02-07 01:56 |
| 00216 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Michael Champion
|
2005-02-07 04:09 |
| 00098 |
swamp cleanup day for xml 1.0 ... |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-07 05:31 |
| 00225 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Kurt Cagle
|
2005-02-07 05:57 |
| 00226 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Kurt Cagle
|
2005-02-07 06:19 |
| 00215 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Amelia A Lewis
|
2005-02-07 07:47 |
| 00158 |
Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Dimitre Novatchev
|
2005-02-07 08:32 |
| 00167 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Kurt Cagle
|
2005-02-07 09:45 |
| 00169 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-07 11:37 |
| 00171 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Chris Burdess
|
2005-02-07 13:16 |
| 00227 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Michael Champion
|
2005-02-07 13:25 |
| 00214 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-07 13:36 |
| 00213 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-07 14:20 |
| 00228 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-07 14:40 |
| 00170 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-07 14:51 |
| 00155 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2005-02-07 15:35 |
| 00166 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-07 15:42 |
| 00157 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-07 15:47 |
| 00192 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-07 16:38 |
| 00184 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Liam Quin
|
2005-02-07 16:58 |
| 00139 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Amelia A Lewis
|
2005-02-07 17:49 |
| 00150 |
RE: spam |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-07 19:46 |
| 00149 |
Unqualified Element without using xs:any |
Don Hillsberry
|
2005-02-07 20:48 |
| 00182 |
RE: [xml-dev] Unqualified Element without using xs:any |
Priscilla Walmsley
|
2005-02-07 21:30 |
| 00193 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-07 22:35 |
| 00180 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-07 22:47 |
| 00197 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-07 22:53 |
| 00222 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-07 22:59 |
| 00207 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-07 23:39 |
| 00159 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bill de hÓra
|
2005-02-08 00:11 |
| 00177 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-08 00:47 |
| 00176 |
RE: [xml-dev] Unqualified Element without using xs:any |
Don Hillsberry
|
2005-02-08 00:55 |
| 00161 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Michael Champion
|
2005-02-08 01:01 |
| 00205 |
Re: [xml-dev] How simple is simple enough? - was Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Bill de hÓra
|
2005-02-08 01:06 |
| 00223 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-08 01:23 |
| 00210 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothi ng left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bill de hÓra
|
2005-02-08 01:30 |
| 00221 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-08 02:46 |
| 00134 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unqualified Element without using xs:any |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-08 02:49 |
| 00143 |
Bounce messages from AdventureMail.com |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-08 02:59 |
| 00154 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-08 03:03 |
| 00199 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-08 03:17 |
| 00191 |
RE: [xml-dev] Bounce messages from AdventureMail.com |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-08 03:25 |
| 00189 |
RE: [xml-dev] Unqualified Element without using xs:any |
Priscilla Walmsley
|
2005-02-08 04:33 |
| 00153 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-08 05:03 |
| 00200 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-08 05:39 |
| 00142 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-08 05:41 |
| 00136 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-08 05:42 |
| 00144 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-08 05:50 |
| 00131 |
This week's XML Puzzler |
Micah Dubinko
|
2005-02-08 05:53 |
| 00148 |
Re: [xml-dev] Bounce messages from AdventureMail.com |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-08 05:55 |
| 00129 |
XSLT stylistics query |
Simon Kissane
|
2005-02-08 06:45 |
| 00187 |
Re: [xml-dev] This week's XML Puzzler |
Jeff Rafter
|
2005-02-08 07:32 |
| 00202 |
Re: [xml-dev] Bounce messages from AdventureMail.com |
Jeff Rafter
|
2005-02-08 07:38 |
| 00203 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylistics query |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-08 09:05 |
| 00186 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Chris Burdess
|
2005-02-08 09:34 |
| 00135 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
sterling
|
2005-02-08 09:41 |
| 00133 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Chris Burdess
|
2005-02-08 09:50 |
| 00141 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-08 10:57 |
| 00211 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-08 12:32 |
| 00218 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-08 13:02 |
| 00175 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Rich Salz
|
2005-02-08 13:18 |
| 00162 |
Re: [xml-dev] This week's XML Puzzler |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-08 13:20 |
| 00140 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-08 13:32 |
| 00165 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-08 15:27 |
| 00172 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-08 15:34 |
| 00219 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-08 15:40 |
| 00209 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-08 16:04 |
| 00224 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-08 16:09 |
| 00206 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-08 16:18 |
| 00164 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Rich Salz
|
2005-02-08 16:32 |
| 00173 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-08 16:49 |
| 00220 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-08 16:53 |
| 00208 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-08 17:05 |
| 00212 |
Java open source Schema aware XPath 2.0 processor released |
Andrea Bittau
|
2005-02-08 17:15 |
| 00217 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-08 17:21 |
| 00174 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-08 17:38 |
| 00163 |
[ADMIN] broken archive |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-08 17:47 |
| 00178 |
Before fragmenting, fix the broken bits first |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-08 17:52 |
| 00160 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Norman Walsh
|
2005-02-08 18:43 |
| 00204 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Derek Denny-Brown
|
2005-02-08 18:53 |
| 00185 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Norman Walsh
|
2005-02-08 18:56 |
| 00132 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Norman Walsh
|
2005-02-08 18:58 |
| 00146 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-08 19:11 |
| 00147 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Norman Walsh
|
2005-02-08 19:28 |
| 00188 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-08 19:52 |
| 00201 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Norman Walsh
|
2005-02-08 20:22 |
| 00190 |
Is the Web Stochastic? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "no thing left but toolkits" myth come from?) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-08 21:20 |
| 00198 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-08 22:12 |
| 00281 |
Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? |
Kenneth Stephen
|
2005-02-08 22:13 |
| 00295 |
Fwd: [xml-dev] Java open source Schema aware XPath 2.0 processor released |
Kenneth Stephen
|
2005-02-08 22:14 |
| 00252 |
Re: [xml-dev] Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-08 22:30 |
| 00237 |
Re: Fwd: [xml-dev] Java open source Schema aware XPath 2.0 processor released |
Andrea Bittau
|
2005-02-08 22:44 |
| 00238 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? |
Adam Souzis
|
2005-02-08 23:15 |
| 00251 |
Re: [xml-dev] Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? |
Kenneth Stephen
|
2005-02-09 00:30 |
| 00296 |
RE: [xml-dev] Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-09 00:40 |
| 00145 |
The XML 300 baud challenge - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-09 02:25 |
| 00279 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-09 03:55 |
| 00130 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-09 11:58 |
| 00294 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-09 12:07 |
| 00283 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-09 12:17 |
| 00268 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-09 12:29 |
| 00256 |
baffling encoding problem |
Bryan Rasmussen
|
2005-02-09 12:45 |
| 00316 |
Re: [xml-dev] baffling encoding problem |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-09 12:56 |
| 00325 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-09 14:01 |
| 00326 |
Combining DTD and Schema declarations in the same XML |
Young Matthew
|
2005-02-09 14:16 |
| 00315 |
Re: [xml-dev] baffling encoding problem |
Bryan Rasmussen
|
2005-02-09 14:19 |
| 00258 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Rich Salz
|
2005-02-09 14:57 |
| 00267 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-09 19:49 |
| 00254 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-09 19:53 |
| 00269 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-09 20:27 |
| 00253 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Wolfgang Hoschek
|
2005-02-09 20:43 |
| 00271 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-09 20:46 |
| 00327 |
Re: [xml-dev] baffling encoding problem |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-09 21:14 |
| 00314 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Michael Champion
|
2005-02-09 21:16 |
| 00313 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-09 21:17 |
| 00328 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Wolfgang Hoschek
|
2005-02-09 22:00 |
| 00270 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-09 22:17 |
| 00255 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2005-02-09 22:22 |
| 00266 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Wolfgang Hoschek
|
2005-02-09 22:32 |
| 00257 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-09 22:56 |
| 00292 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Wolfgang Hoschek
|
2005-02-09 23:21 |
| 00284 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Joe Dane
|
2005-02-09 23:33 |
| 00239 |
external entities |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-09 23:59 |
| 00250 |
Re: [xml-dev] external entities |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-10 00:33 |
| 00249 |
Re: [xml-dev] external entities |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-10 00:51 |
| 00240 |
Re: [xml-dev] external entities |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-10 01:13 |
| 00282 |
extrernal entities - part 2 |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-10 02:24 |
| 00293 |
Re: [xml-dev] extrernal entities - part 2 |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-10 02:34 |
| 00280 |
Re: [xml-dev] extrernal entities - part 2 |
Robert Koberg
|
2005-02-10 02:35 |
| 00297 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Rich Salz
|
2005-02-10 02:43 |
| 00307 |
Re: [xml-dev] extrernal entities - part 2 |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-10 03:12 |
| 00259 |
Re: [xml-dev] external entities |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-10 08:53 |
| 00276 |
Re: [xml-dev] external entities |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-10 11:22 |
| 00277 |
Re: [xml-dev] external entities |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-10 11:25 |
| 00261 |
RE: [xml-dev] Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? |
Thomas, Mark - BLS CTR
|
2005-02-10 16:18 |
| 00323 |
Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-10 16:46 |
| 00305 |
Re: [xml-dev] Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? |
Frank Richards
|
2005-02-10 16:49 |
| 00310 |
RE: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-10 17:17 |
| 00321 |
Re: [xml-dev] external entities |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-10 17:39 |
| 00234 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-10 18:13 |
| 00243 |
RE: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-10 18:23 |
| 00322 |
Re: [xml-dev] extrernal entities - part 2 |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-10 18:56 |
| 00299 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-10 18:58 |
| 00291 |
XML turns 7 |
Oleg Tkachenko
|
2005-02-10 19:16 |
| 00289 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-10 19:34 |
| 00300 |
Re: [xml-dev] external entities |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-10 20:37 |
| 00242 |
XML jargon: declaration vs. definition |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-10 20:42 |
| 00236 |
Re: [xml-dev] external entities |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-10 21:05 |
| 00244 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML jargon: declaration vs. definition |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-10 21:06 |
| 00231 |
[xml-dev] XML jargon: declaration vs. definition |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-10 21:35 |
| 00248 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-10 22:51 |
| 00229 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML jargon: declaration vs. definition |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-10 22:59 |
| 00287 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-11 01:52 |
| 00302 |
does expat support xsd? |
Howard Dong
|
2005-02-11 03:23 |
| 00303 |
Assigning meaning to an element if attributes are present |
Young Matthew
|
2005-02-11 07:10 |
| 00286 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-11 08:50 |
| 00233 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-11 09:14 |
| 00245 |
Re: [xml-dev] does expat support xsd? |
Petr Cimprich
|
2005-02-11 14:19 |
| 00235 |
@href or @src? |
Frans Englich
|
2005-02-11 21:49 |
| 00241 |
RE: [xml-dev] @href or @src? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-11 22:12 |
| 00311 |
RE: [xml-dev] @href or @src? |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-12 00:28 |
| 00318 |
Re: [xml-dev] @href or @src? |
Micah Dubinko
|
2005-02-12 02:28 |
| 00275 |
Re: [xml-dev] @href or @src? |
Frans Englich
|
2005-02-12 03:52 |
| 00262 |
Re: [xml-dev] @href or @src? |
'Frans Englich'
|
2005-02-12 04:14 |
| 00317 |
Public Review of OASIS ebXML RIM and RS v3.0 specifications |
James Bryce Clark
|
2005-02-12 16:21 |
| 00265 |
use of xslt.rnc or xslt.xsd? |
DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)
|
2005-02-12 17:54 |
| 00272 |
Re: use of xslt.rnc or xslt.xsd? |
Dimitre Novatchev
|
2005-02-12 21:41 |
| 00319 |
[ANN] nux-1.0 final release |
Wolfgang Hoschek
|
2005-02-12 21:56 |
| 00309 |
what is the difference between "xs" and "xsd" for XML schema? |
Howard Dong
|
2005-02-12 22:48 |
| 00324 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: use of xslt.rnc or xslt.xsd? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-12 23:40 |
| 00306 |
RE: [xml-dev] what is the difference between "xs" and "xsd" for XML schema? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-12 23:45 |
| 00264 |
Re: [xml-dev] use of xslt.rnc or xslt.xsd? |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-13 00:59 |
| 00273 |
Re: [xml-dev] use of xslt.rnc or xslt.xsd? |
Jeff Rafter
|
2005-02-13 15:14 |
| 00320 |
RE: [xml-dev] what is the difference between "xs" and "xsd" for XML schema? |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-13 16:39 |
| 00308 |
[ANN] RSSDigest |
PA
|
2005-02-13 20:08 |
| 00312 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-13 22:33 |
| 00263 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Alessandro Triglia
|
2005-02-14 15:27 |
| 00278 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Bill Kearney
|
2005-02-14 15:52 |
| 00260 |
URLs of DTDs question |
Ingo Weiss
|
2005-02-14 15:58 |
| 00304 |
RE: [xml-dev] URLs of DTDs question |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-14 16:08 |
| 00285 |
RE: [xml-dev] URLs of DTDs question |
Ingo Weiss
|
2005-02-14 16:11 |
| 00232 |
Re: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems |
Nathan Young
|
2005-02-14 20:27 |
| 00246 |
RE: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-14 20:43 |
| 00230 |
RE: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-14 21:14 |
| 00288 |
Re: [xml-dev] URLs of DTDs question |
Jirka Kosek
|
2005-02-14 21:39 |
| 00301 |
RE: [xml-dev] Public Review of OASIS ebXML RIM and RS v3.0 specifications |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-14 22:13 |
| 00290 |
Re: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems |
Nathan Young
|
2005-02-14 23:28 |
| 00298 |
Re: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-15 00:18 |
| 00274 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-15 01:33 |
| 00381 |
Re: [xml-dev] Before fragmenting, fix the broken bits first |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2005-02-15 01:34 |
| 00395 |
Re: [xml-dev] Before fragmenting, fix the broken bits first |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-15 02:14 |
| 00352 |
Re: [xml-dev] Before fragmenting, fix the broken bits first |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2005-02-15 03:09 |
| 00337 |
Re: [xml-dev] Before fragmenting, fix the broken bits first |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-15 03:59 |
| 00338 |
Re: [xml-dev] Before fragmenting, fix the broken bits first |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-15 05:03 |
| 00351 |
Re: [xml-dev] Before fragmenting, fix the broken bits first |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-15 05:39 |
| 00396 |
Master Foo explains XML to aliens |
Sean McGrath
|
2005-02-15 10:21 |
| 00379 |
Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Neeraj Bajaj
|
2005-02-15 10:54 |
| 00394 |
Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Chris Burdess
|
2005-02-15 12:40 |
| 00383 |
Re: [xml-dev] Master Foo explains XML to aliens |
Michael Champion
|
2005-02-15 13:05 |
| 00247 |
Re: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-15 13:15 |
| 00368 |
RE: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-15 14:16 |
| 00356 |
Re: [xml-dev] Master Foo explains XML to aliens |
Jan Algermissen
|
2005-02-15 14:30 |
| 00416 |
Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Neeraj Bajaj
|
2005-02-15 17:00 |
| 00425 |
Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Chris Burdess
|
2005-02-15 17:34 |
| 00426 |
Dynamically generating Java 'wrapper' class for XML |
Oswald Campesato
|
2005-02-16 00:57 |
| 00415 |
Re: [xml-dev] Dynamically generating Java 'wrapper' class for XML |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-16 02:31 |
| 00358 |
Re: [xml-dev] Dynamically generating Java 'wrapper' class for XML |
Farrukh Najmi
|
2005-02-16 02:47 |
| 00354 |
Re: [xml-dev] Master Foo explains XML to aliens |
Bjoern Hoehrmann
|
2005-02-16 04:39 |
| 00369 |
Re: [xml-dev] Dynamically generating Java 'wrapper' class for XML |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-16 06:55 |
| 00353 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-16 07:02 |
| 00371 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-16 07:03 |
| 00427 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-16 08:20 |
| 00413 |
Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Neeraj Bajaj
|
2005-02-16 17:01 |
| 00428 |
choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question |
John Graybeal
|
2005-02-16 17:10 |
| 00370 |
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question |
David Carlisle
|
2005-02-16 17:27 |
| 00355 |
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-16 17:53 |
| 00366 |
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2005-02-16 18:45 |
| 00357 |
Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-16 19:23 |
| 00392 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-16 19:32 |
| 00384 |
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question |
Don Bate
|
2005-02-16 19:46 |
| 00339 |
Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-16 19:48 |
| 00367 |
Re: [xml-dev] Master Foo explains XML to aliens |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-16 20:29 |
| 00350 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-16 21:36 |
| 00349 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-16 21:57 |
| 00340 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2005-02-16 22:10 |
| 00382 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-16 22:15 |
| 00393 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-16 22:26 |
| 00397 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-16 22:27 |
| 00380 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
Jeff Greif
|
2005-02-16 22:29 |
| 00422 |
The Stealth Specs: XQuery / XSLT publish 10 Working Drafts |
Jonathan Robie
|
2005-02-16 22:39 |
| 00407 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-16 22:41 |
| 00359 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2005-02-16 22:45 |
| 00377 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-16 22:45 |
| 00376 |
RE: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-16 22:52 |
| 00361 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-16 23:01 |
| 00405 |
RE: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-16 23:02 |
| 00423 |
sequence with elements with the same name is not allowed? |
Hans-Peter Kuechler
|
2005-02-16 23:12 |
| 00410 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-16 23:14 |
| 00421 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
Nathan Young
|
2005-02-16 23:15 |
| 00334 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
Nathan Young
|
2005-02-16 23:15 |
| 00343 |
RE: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-16 23:43 |
| 00399 |
RE: [xml-dev] sequence with elements with the same name is not allowed? |
Stan Kitsis
|
2005-02-16 23:57 |
| 00414 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-17 01:15 |
| 00391 |
RE: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question |
Don Bate
|
2005-02-17 01:22 |
| 00389 |
Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Bill de hÓra
|
2005-02-17 01:39 |
| 00400 |
RE: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-17 02:00 |
| 00342 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
cr88192
|
2005-02-17 02:19 |
| 00336 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? |
Rich Salz
|
2005-02-17 04:51 |
| 00344 |
RE: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-17 09:08 |
| 00331 |
RE: [xml-dev] sequence with elements with the same name is not allowed? |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-17 09:27 |
| 00348 |
Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" |
Bill de hÓra
|
2005-02-17 11:30 |
| 00329 |
What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-17 11:57 |
| 00387 |
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-17 13:06 |
| 00402 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Bill de hÓra
|
2005-02-17 13:20 |
| 00424 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Chris Burdess
|
2005-02-17 13:41 |
| 00403 |
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-17 13:41 |
| 00386 |
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-17 14:53 |
| 00333 |
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-17 15:04 |
| 00345 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-17 18:20 |
| 00335 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-17 18:30 |
| 00341 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-17 18:40 |
| 00411 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-17 18:42 |
| 00418 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Paul R Brown
|
2005-02-17 19:13 |
| 00375 |
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-17 20:11 |
| 00362 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Bill de hÓra
|
2005-02-17 20:14 |
| 00365 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Bill de hÓra
|
2005-02-17 20:19 |
| 00372 |
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-17 21:21 |
| 00419 |
New Technologies will change the business of publishing -- learn how -- March 9 in New York |
Elledge, Marion
|
2005-02-17 23:13 |
| 00409 |
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.1 : Updated 2005-02-17 |
Tech Support
|
2005-02-18 01:40 |
| 00406 |
Substitution Groups |
Paul Spencer
|
2005-02-18 10:00 |
| 00364 |
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-18 10:36 |
| 00373 |
Transmitting XML between different applications |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2005-02-18 11:31 |
| 00420 |
Transmitting XML between different applications |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2005-02-18 11:31 |
| 00412 |
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2005-02-18 12:57 |
| 00408 |
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Antonio Jose Jimeno Yepes
|
2005-02-18 13:23 |
| 00417 |
Re: [xml-dev] Substitution Groups |
Andy Greener
|
2005-02-18 15:09 |
| 00374 |
Re: [xml-dev] Substitution Groups |
Jeff Greif
|
2005-02-18 17:01 |
| 00363 |
Re: [xml-dev] Substitution Groups |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-18 17:24 |
| 00378 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Prakash Yamuna
|
2005-02-18 21:07 |
| 00360 |
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-18 21:18 |
| 00404 |
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Prakash Yamuna
|
2005-02-18 22:08 |
| 00385 |
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-18 22:13 |
| 00332 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-18 22:47 |
| 00346 |
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-18 22:53 |
| 00347 |
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-18 22:58 |
| 00388 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Prakash Yamuna
|
2005-02-18 23:18 |
| 00401 |
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-18 23:25 |
| 00390 |
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Prakash Yamuna
|
2005-02-18 23:55 |
| 00398 |
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-19 00:08 |
| 00495 |
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Prakash Yamuna
|
2005-02-19 00:31 |
| 00452 |
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2005-02-19 04:05 |
| 00437 |
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-19 04:59 |
| 00438 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Kevin Jones
|
2005-02-19 07:39 |
| 00451 |
RE: [xml-dev] Substitution Groups |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-19 08:55 |
| 00496 |
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-19 09:03 |
| 00479 |
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2005-02-19 09:38 |
| 00494 |
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-19 09:49 |
| 00483 |
RE: [xml-dev] Substitution Groups |
Paul Spencer
|
2005-02-19 10:22 |
| 00468 |
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2005-02-19 10:22 |
| 00456 |
Re: [xml-dev] Substitution Groups |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-19 11:08 |
| 00516 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-19 11:12 |
| 00525 |
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-19 11:16 |
| 00526 |
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-19 11:23 |
| 00515 |
RE: [xml-dev] Substitution Groups |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-19 11:36 |
| 00458 |
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2005-02-19 11:42 |
| 00467 |
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-19 12:40 |
| 00454 |
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2005-02-19 14:46 |
| 00480 |
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Chris Burdess
|
2005-02-19 15:09 |
| 00330 |
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-19 15:25 |
| 00469 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Kevin Jones
|
2005-02-19 16:21 |
| 00481 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-19 16:26 |
| 00453 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-19 16:31 |
| 00471 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-19 16:37 |
| 00527 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Kevin Jones
|
2005-02-19 17:42 |
| 00514 |
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-19 17:51 |
| 00513 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-19 19:12 |
| 00528 |
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-19 23:34 |
| 00493 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Chris Burdess
|
2005-02-20 09:02 |
| 00470 |
[ANN] XML BeLux XML Schema Series |
Paul Hermans
|
2005-02-20 14:13 |
| 00455 |
DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" |
Razvan MIHAIU
|
2005-02-20 16:29 |
| 00466 |
RE: [xml-dev] DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-20 17:10 |
| 00457 |
Re: [xml-dev] DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-20 17:26 |
| 00492 |
Re: [xml-dev] DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-20 17:44 |
| 00484 |
Re: [xml-dev] DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" |
Razvan MIHAIU
|
2005-02-20 18:01 |
| 00439 |
A Business Analysts View: 3 XML Design Principles |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-20 19:09 |
| 00450 |
Re: [xml-dev] DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-20 19:20 |
| 00449 |
[ANN] Five new utilities from Topologi |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2005-02-21 04:43 |
| 00440 |
[ANN] Topologi Markup Editor 2.3 |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2005-02-21 05:23 |
| 00482 |
Re: [xml-dev] Substitution Groups |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-21 08:36 |
| 00497 |
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2005-02-21 11:21 |
| 00522 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Kevin Jones
|
2005-02-21 16:23 |
| 00507 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-21 16:39 |
| 00459 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Wolfgang Hoschek
|
2005-02-21 16:55 |
| 00476 |
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2005-02-21 22:11 |
| 00461 |
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-21 23:15 |
| 00505 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-21 23:45 |
| 00523 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Prakash Yamuna
|
2005-02-22 05:03 |
| 00510 |
Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke Kawaguchi) |
Razvan MIHAIU
|
2005-02-22 06:36 |
| 00521 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-22 10:05 |
| 00434 |
schema keyref to other schema. |
Stephan Dick
|
2005-02-22 10:45 |
| 00443 |
RE: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-22 11:13 |
| 00477 |
Re: [xml-dev] Master Foo explains XML to aliens |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-22 12:21 |
| 00499 |
dynamic elements |
James William Pye
|
2005-02-22 13:33 |
| 00491 |
<offtopic> Jobs |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-22 15:25 |
| 00489 |
X3D Midi Sensor Node |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-22 18:40 |
| 00500 |
Re: [xml-dev] X3D Midi Sensor Node |
B Tommie Usdin
|
2005-02-22 18:48 |
| 00442 |
RE: [xml-dev] X3D Midi Sensor Node |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2005-02-22 19:01 |
| 00436 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Wolfgang Hoschek
|
2005-02-22 21:39 |
| 00444 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Wolfgang Hoschek
|
2005-02-22 21:45 |
| 00431 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2005-02-23 09:41 |
| 00448 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
Bryan Rasmussen
|
2005-02-23 09:47 |
| 00429 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke Kawaguchi) |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-23 10:11 |
| 00487 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
George Cristian Bina
|
2005-02-23 10:23 |
| 00502 |
XML nd images |
OwlService
|
2005-02-23 10:37 |
| 00503 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML nd images |
Altsoft Xml2PDF
|
2005-02-23 11:17 |
| 00486 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke Kawaguchi) |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-23 12:27 |
| 00433 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-23 12:40 |
| 00445 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke Kawaguchi) |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-23 12:42 |
| 00435 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-23 12:53 |
| 00441 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-23 13:07 |
| 00511 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-23 13:41 |
| 00475 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke Kawaguchi) |
G. Ken Holman
|
2005-02-23 14:38 |
| 00518 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke |
G. Ken Holman
|
2005-02-23 14:39 |
| 00462 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-23 14:51 |
| 00465 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-23 15:14 |
| 00472 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by |
David Carlisle
|
2005-02-23 15:27 |
| 00519 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by |
G. Ken Holman
|
2005-02-23 15:36 |
| 00509 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-23 15:58 |
| 00524 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
David Carlisle
|
2005-02-23 15:58 |
| 00506 |
[XUS] An XML URN Scheme |
Philippe Poulard
|
2005-02-23 15:58 |
| 00464 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML nd images |
Darshan Singh
|
2005-02-23 16:14 |
| 00473 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Wolfgang Hoschek
|
2005-02-23 16:28 |
| 00520 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2005-02-23 16:40 |
| 00508 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2005-02-23 16:51 |
| 00512 |
Open source XML Schema Editor (graphical) in Java |
Judith Winter
|
2005-02-23 17:49 |
| 00517 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke |
Liam Quin
|
2005-02-23 18:51 |
| 00474 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
Liam Quin
|
2005-02-23 18:53 |
| 00463 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
David Carlisle
|
2005-02-23 19:35 |
| 00478 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-23 20:19 |
| 00460 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Wolfgang Hoschek
|
2005-02-23 20:24 |
| 00504 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-23 21:05 |
| 00485 |
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") |
Wolfgang Hoschek
|
2005-02-23 21:14 |
| 00432 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2005-02-24 05:44 |
| 00446 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
Liam Quin
|
2005-02-24 14:34 |
| 00447 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
G. Ken Holman
|
2005-02-24 14:53 |
| 00430 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
Eric van der Vlist
|
2005-02-24 14:56 |
| 00488 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
David Carlisle
|
2005-02-24 15:25 |
| 00501 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
Liam Quin
|
2005-02-24 16:13 |
| 00490 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
David Carlisle
|
2005-02-24 16:18 |
| 00498 |
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2005-02-24 17:43 |
| 00551 |
question about xercesc |
Howard Dong
|
2005-02-24 19:10 |
| 00558 |
RE: [xml-dev] question about xercesc |
Jinyu Wang
|
2005-02-24 19:32 |
| 00536 |
Re: [xml-dev] question about xercesc |
Wei Lu
|
2005-02-24 20:49 |
| 00529 |
You are made active |
Uche.ogbuji
|
2005-02-24 21:11 |
| 00530 |
XML Binary Characterization publishes three new drafts |
Robin Berjon
|
2005-02-25 11:21 |
| 00535 |
[XUS] URN applied to Document Management Systems |
Philippe Poulard
|
2005-02-25 13:02 |
| 00559 |
RSS/RSS-Data for General Data Exchange |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2005-02-25 17:04 |
| 00549 |
[ANN] XTech 2005 schedule posted |
Edd Dumbill
|
2005-02-26 13:14 |
| 00557 |
[ANN] xframe - xsddoc 0.7-beta released |
Kurt Riede
|
2005-02-26 17:56 |
| 00553 |
[ANN] MarkupWare - SilkPage Core 0.3.0 released |
Sina Heshmati
|
2005-02-27 10:27 |
| 00545 |
Re: [docbook-apps] [ANN] MarkupWare - SilkPage Core 0.3.0 released |
Dave Pawson
|
2005-02-27 11:35 |
| 00540 |
Re: [docbook-apps] [ANN] MarkupWare - SilkPage Core 0.3.0 released |
Dave Pawson
|
2005-02-27 11:39 |
| 00563 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [docbook-apps] [ANN] MarkupWare - SilkPage Core 0.3.0 released |
Dave Pawson
|
2005-02-27 11:41 |
| 00564 |
Re: [docbook-apps] [ANN] MarkupWare - SilkPage Core 0.3.0 released |
Sina K. Heshmati
|
2005-02-27 13:15 |
| 00562 |
Re: [xml-dev] Foolin' around with multilingual and German and datatyping... |
William J. Kammerer
|
2005-02-27 16:23 |
| 00542 |
Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] MarkupWare - SilkPage Core 0.3.0 released |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-27 17:44 |
| 00544 |
Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] MarkupWare - SilkPage Core 0.3.0 released |
Sina K. Heshmati
|
2005-02-27 19:14 |
| 00538 |
Quiz: XML flexibility |
Razvan MIHAIU
|
2005-02-27 19:59 |
| 00546 |
RE: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-27 20:19 |
| 00537 |
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
G. Ken Holman
|
2005-02-27 20:29 |
| 00566 |
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
Razvan MIHAIU
|
2005-02-27 20:32 |
| 00548 |
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
William J. Kammerer
|
2005-02-27 20:32 |
| 00561 |
Document order calculation |
Elliotte Harold
|
2005-02-27 20:49 |
| 00560 |
RE: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-27 21:09 |
| 00567 |
Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] MarkupWare - SilkPage Core 0.3.0 released |
Bob Foster
|
2005-02-27 21:58 |
| 00547 |
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
Razvan MIHAIU
|
2005-02-27 22:05 |
| 00539 |
Re: [xml-dev] Document order calculation |
[email protected]
|
2005-02-27 22:24 |
| 00543 |
RE: [xml-dev] Document order calculation |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-27 23:39 |
| 00541 |
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
William J. Kammerer
|
2005-02-27 23:43 |
| 00555 |
RE: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
Michael Kay
|
2005-02-27 23:44 |
| 00554 |
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
G. Ken Holman
|
2005-02-28 00:54 |
| 00531 |
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
Rick Marshall
|
2005-02-28 03:34 |
| 00534 |
WSDL too hard? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2005-02-28 04:02 |
| 00565 |
Foolin' around with multilingual and German and datatyping... |
David Lyon
|
2005-02-28 06:18 |
| 00532 |
RE: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
Kirkham, Pete (UK)
|
2005-02-28 10:12 |
| 00552 |
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
William J. Kammerer
|
2005-02-28 13:06 |
| 00556 |
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
Ronald Bourret
|
2005-02-28 17:35 |
| 00550 |
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility |
Jeff Rafter
|
2005-02-28 18:36 |
| 00533 |
Re: [xml-dev] Foolin' around with multilingual and German and datatyping... |
David Lyon
|
2005-03-01 00:38 |
