RE: terminology

Sanjay Dalal 
  sent:

  
 

  
As I was suggesting on conf. call today, we 
  should have glossary of terms that we are going to use while defining 
  specifications. Peter Furniss agreed to define 4 levels. I suggest that we 
  extend that list gradually as we progress. This must also be a list 
  of terms that will be used consistently across subcommittees. I 
  suggest a person involved in subcommittees of specification doc. and 
  protocol model should take care of this. 

  
 

  
As 
  you'll see, they're draft definitions with a summary of the discussion - 
  probably will need reworking (even if everyone agrees without, which I doubt). 
  (BTW, the format (Word) was just because I wanted better than flat-text and 
  that's what I drafted it with - if people what something different, let me 
  know)

  
 

  
You 
  are right that we need a steadily extending list of terms, and I can be the 
  custodian unless others are really keen :-)

  
 

  
Peter