Hello,
Here is another try at 3.1.2.7. No tables this time!
--
Stuart Galt
SGML Resource Group
(206) 544-3656
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 6:11 AM
> To: ; Galt, Stuart A; 'CGM Open WebCGM TC'
> Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] Potential table 3.1.2.7
>
> I may have misunderstood the conclusion at last week's
> telecon, but I thought we would get rid of the table and
> replace it with something like nested bullet lists, or terse
> prose text, or something like that -- something more verbose,
> in any case, that will be clear about where to look
> (link) for the normative presentation of the rules about the
> particular cases.
>
> -Lofton.
>
> At 09:30 AM 4/12/2006 +0200, Dieter Weidenbrück wrote:
> >Stuart,
> >
> >one comment:
> >The first entry in the table lists an object behavior
> "without picterm".
> >Please note that some forms of the fragment require the full
> fragment,
> >i.e. picterm.objterm.
> >So I suggest to change the wording of that entry to something like
> >"picBehavior will be ignored".
> >
> >Also, for valid WebCGM 1.0 files as well as any cascaded
> multi-picture
> >files, the picterm might point to another picture in the same file,
> >which should be legal.
> >
> >Dieter
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Galt, Stuart A [mailto:]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 1:14 AM
> > > To: CGM Open WebCGM TC
> > > Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] Potential table 3.1.2.7
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > After playing with the table in 3.1.2.7 and trying all sorts of
> > > things made it much worse I finally began to understand it (I
> > > think). I left the targets of the links the same, but
> changed the
> > > callouts a bit to help if it was used in printed form.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Stuart Galt
> > > SGML Resource Group
> > >
> > > (206) 544-3656
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
