Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] LW DITA DTDs - adding <fig>

From
Mark Giffin <>
Date
2015-08-10T15:24:46+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] LW DITA DTDs - adding <fig>
The LW DITA DTDs are here:

    

    https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/dita/subcommittees/LightweightDITA/org.oasis.lwdita

    

    Mark

    

    
On 8/10/2015 7:48 AM, Don R. Day wrote:

    

    
      
      Web pages commonly use blockquotes for artful text quips (pull
      quotes, ie conrefs from the marketing/news narrative, in effect)
      as well as for lengthy quotes used in the usual research/context
      manner. Web themes usually provide a theme-specific CSS class
      value that manages the visual distinction. Via Lightweight DITA,
      authors could use an easy way to "clone elements for a new
      semantic role" to handle that need with improved components.

      

      But in general, it's hard to say what ought *not* be allowed
      inside fig. If there is no cost to leaving them in, I'm inclined
      to allow more things, not less. My reasoning is that fig's payload
      (the part that an editor would expose as a typed field) is the
      same as the body field, hence an implementation could call for the
      same datatype handling in both editing cases. If you restrict what
      one field can have, then your implementation must support "fig
      field" content interfaces vs "body field" interfaces. In standard,
      schema-driven editors, these field definitions ultimately go back
      to PCDATA, timestamps, and other typed data primitives.
      Lightweight editors necessarily focus on the more narrative chunks
      of content, hence having fewer narrative data types helps to lower
      the cost of implementation. This long reasoning hearkens back to
      identifying what a common "para block" data-type requires and in
      what places that block may be allowed (body, li, lq, section, fig,
      note, etc. all come to mind as being basically the same).

      --

      Don

      

      
On 8/10/2015 1:37 AM, Mark Giffin
        wrote:

      

      I
        am adding <fig> to the Lightweight DITA DTDs and I need
        some agreement on what to leave out. <fig> can contain
        many elements and attributes in full DITA. 

        

        I think I should leave out these elements for LW DITA: 

        

        figgroup, fn, lines, lq, note, sl, data-about 

        

        I'm leaving in these elements, which were already allowed: 

        

        title, desc, data, simpletable, xref, dl, image, object, ol, p,
        pre, ul 

        

        Thoughts? I'm still working on the attributes. 

        

        Mark Giffin 

        Mark Giffin Consulting, Inc. 

        http://markgiffin.com/ 

        

        ---------------------------------------------------------------------

        

        To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
        that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in
        OASIS at: 

        https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
        

      
      

      
-- 

        
        
 Don R. Day

          Founding Chair, OASIS

            DITA Technical Committee

          LinkedIn: donrday   Twitter:

          @donrday

          About.me: Don R. Day   Skype:
          don.r.day 

        
 "Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?

          Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"

          --T.S. Eliot  

      

      

      

      
      
        
          

                
            
              
 This email has been checked for
                viruses by Avast antivirus software. 

                www.avast.com