Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] LW DITA DTDs - adding <fig>

From
Don R. Day <>
Date
2015-08-10T14:48:48+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] LW DITA DTDs - adding <fig>
Web pages commonly use blockquotes for artful text quips (pull
    quotes, ie conrefs from the marketing/news narrative, in effect) as
    well as for lengthy quotes used in the usual research/context
    manner. Web themes usually provide a theme-specific CSS class value
    that manages the visual distinction. Via Lightweight DITA, authors
    could use an easy way to "clone elements for a new semantic role" to
    handle that need with improved components.

    

    But in general, it's hard to say what ought *not* be allowed inside
    fig. If there is no cost to leaving them in, I'm inclined to allow
    more things, not less. My reasoning is that fig's payload (the part
    that an editor would expose as a typed field) is the same as the
    body field, hence an implementation could call for the same datatype
    handling in both editing cases. If you restrict what one field can
    have, then your implementation must support "fig field" content
    interfaces vs "body field" interfaces. In standard, schema-driven
    editors, these field definitions ultimately go back to PCDATA,
    timestamps, and other typed data primitives. Lightweight editors
    necessarily focus on the more narrative chunks of content, hence
    having fewer narrative data types helps to lower the cost of
    implementation. This long reasoning hearkens back to identifying
    what a common "para block" data-type requires and in what places
    that block may be allowed (body, li, lq, section, fig, note, etc.
    all come to mind as being basically the same).

    --

    Don

    

    
On 8/10/2015 1:37 AM, Mark Giffin
      wrote:

    

    I
      am adding <fig> to the Lightweight DITA DTDs and I need some
      agreement on what to leave out. <fig> can contain many
      elements and attributes in full DITA.
      

      

      I think I should leave out these elements for LW DITA:
      

      

      figgroup, fn, lines, lq, note, sl, data-about
      

      

      I'm leaving in these elements, which were already allowed:
      

      

      title, desc, data, simpletable, xref, dl, image, object, ol, p,
      pre, ul
      

      

      Thoughts? I'm still working on the attributes.
      

      

      Mark Giffin
      

      Mark Giffin Consulting, Inc.
      

      http://markgiffin.com/
      

      

---------------------------------------------------------------------
      

      To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
      that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in
      OASIS at:
      

      https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
      

    
    

    
-- 

      
      

        Don R. Day

        Founding Chair, OASIS
          DITA Technical Committee

        LinkedIn: donrday   Twitter:
        @donrday

        About.me: Don R. Day   Skype:
        don.r.day
      

      

        "Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?

        Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"

        --T.S. Eliot 
      

    

  

	

		
			
				
			
		
		
			

				This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
				
www.avast.com