← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [dita] My comments about DITA applicability torequirements and a separate standard for specialization
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 --> dita message [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home] Subject: Re: [dita] My comments about DITA applicability torequirements and a separate standard for specialization From: Don Day <> To: "W. Eliot Kimber" <> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:32:33 -0600 "W. Eliot Kimber" <> wrote on 12/08/2004 02:40:46 PM: > But the current topic model requires body, even though a topic without a > body but with required subtopics is arguably perfectly meaningful (even > though it might not be good writing practice). > > This is an example where current DITA is too restrictive, probably > reflecting a business rule decision that IBM made (subtopics shall > always be introduced) but that is inappropriate, in a general standard, > to impose on everyone.] FWIW, optional body is first on the list of suggested fixes documented at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200411/msg00023.html 1. Make the body element optional in base topic as well as for task, concept, and reference The original intent was not so much a business rule as a case of nostalgia for absolutes ("doesn't every DTD have a body?"). Designing an archtetype for greatest generality means putting aside most of the conventional wisdom about the concrete instances we've worked with. We'll make a lot more headway for DITA 2.0. Regards, -- Don Day <> Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee IBM Lead DITA Architect 11501 Burnet Rd., MS 9037D018, Austin TX 78758 Ph. 512-838-8550 (T/L 678-8550) "Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?" --T.S. Eliot Follow-Ups: replacement for information type terminology? From: Michael Priestley <> References: Re: [dita] My comments about DITA applicability torequirements and a separate standard for specialization From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <> [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →