Hi Bob,
wrote on 08/11/2007 07:34:41
AM:
> The IP-XACT folks have chosen to define a "name" element
that is a
> required sub-element of several other elements. Since DITA 1.1
> defines a @name attribute, are we going to slam into problems if we
> create a specialized _element_ called "name"?
I can't imagine that it would be a problem, especially
considering that it already happens now (example: DITA has an audience
element, and an audience attribute).
--
Deborah Pickett
Information Architect, Moldflow Corporation, Melbourne
