Thanks Deborah!
From:
[mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07,
2007 7:50 PM
To: Beims Bob
Cc: ;
Subject: Re: [dita] SIDSC
specialization element naming question
Hi Bob,
wrote on 08/11/2007 07:34:41 AM:
> The
IP-XACT folks have chosen to define a "name" element that is a
>
required sub-element of several other elements. Since DITA 1.1
>
defines a @name attribute, are we going to slam into problems if we
>
create a specialized _element_ called "name"?
I can't imagine that it would be a problem, especially considering that
it already happens now (example: DITA has an audience element, and an audience
attribute).
--
Deborah
Pickett
Information Architect, Moldflow Corporation,
Melbourne
