Fw: Looking at Redesigning Hazard Statement Domain for DITA 2.0

This is the response I got from Jang about the Hazard Statement Domain last week.

I suggest we stick a pin in the original proposal and use it as a placeholder under he comes up the full, new proposal he has promised to deliver.

Cheers!

 

-

Keith Schengili-Roberts

Market Researcher and DITA Evangelist

 

IXIASOFT 

825 Querbes, Suite 200, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2V 3X1

tel  + 1 514
 279-4942  /  toll free + 1 877 279-4942 

  / 
www.ixiasoft.com

From: Jang Graat <>

Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 3:22 AM

To: Keith Schengili-Roberts

Subject: Re: Looking at Redesigning Hazard Statement Domain for DITA 2.0

 

Hi Keith,

I will write an initial proposal, which I can present to the TC on one of the upcoming calls. I do need a little time to make this a good proposal, not the half-hearted one that was concocted for the current hazardstatement element. Safety is a huge deal
 in machine industry, so the domain needs to cover all common use cases in a way that meets the requirements of the various safety-related standards. I have good connections to a number of CE safety specialists, whom I can ask for feedback in the second stage,
 where the markup is going to be defined.

Ciao from Amsterdam  

Jang F.M. Graat

Smart Information Design

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Cell: +31 646 854 996