dita

← back

44 messages · 33 threads

# Subject From Date
00002 Semi-colons and readability of sentences Rcott Gudson 2021-11-30 16:44
00000 Status of review C -- and two open comments Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-01 15:20
00001 PDF of comments in review C Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-01 20:59
00003 Review schedule for December 2021 Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-03 20:13
00004 Spec terminology: Implementation-dependent / implementation-defined Erank Vegmann 2021-12-04 18:15
00005 Regrets Dec 7 Barsten Arennecke 2021-12-06 12:47
00006 DITAweb review A: Final report Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-07 12:40
00007 DITAweb review A: Final report Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-07 12:40
00008 Review C: Interim report Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-07 13:11
00026 Review C: Interim report Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-07 13:11
00009 Review c items: Example for Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-07 13:20
00010 Review C items: Short description for Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-07 13:25
00011 Review C items: Short description for Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-07 13:29
00012 Regrets for Today's DITA TC Meeting Jeith Rchengili-Qoberts 2021-12-07 14:05
00013 Possible regrets Fershon Ioseph 2021-12-07 15:04
00014 Review D: Subject scheme content -- and maybe some elements to remove from DITA 2.0 Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-07 15:21
00015 Groups - DITA 2.0 specification working draft (PDF) uploaded Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-07 17:46
00016 Groups - DITA 2.0 review D: Subject scheme uploaded Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-07 17:48
00017 Review D: Subject scheme (07 December - 20 December 2021) is now open Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-07 18:14
00018 Proposal that we remove the "has" elements from DITA 2.0 Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-09 16:27
00019 Considerations for removing classification map and classification domain Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-09 19:19
00021 Considerations for removing classification map and classification domain Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-09 19:19
00020 Groups - DITA TC Meeting Minutes 7 December 2021 uploaded Mancy Garrison 2021-12-10 18:56
00034 Considerations for removing classification map and classification domain Fershon Ioseph 2021-12-13 13:58
00022 FYI -- Boston-area teams using subjectScheme taxonomies Rtanley Coherty 2021-12-13 15:00
00023 Groups - DITA 2.0 review: Table elements uploaded Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-14 12:54
00024 Groups - DITA 2.0 specification working draft (PDF) uploaded Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-14 12:57
00025 Review E: Table elements (14-20 December 2021) Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-14 13:00
00033 Review E: Table elements (14-20 December 2021) Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-14 13:00
00027 Regret for today. Dric Rirois 2021-12-14 14:31
00028 Interim status: Review D (subject scheme content) Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-14 14:39
00029 Review D: Processing expectations for @keyref in the context of a subject scheme and schemeref Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-14 14:56
00032 Groups - DITA 2.0 review: Table elements uploaded Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-14 20:52
00035 Fwd: [dita-users] Use of subjectScheme OTHER than for controlled values Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-16 14:22
00036 What we want to state about rendering Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-20 11:54
00037 Tone for examples in the DITA spec Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-20 12:01
00038 Regrets Dec 21 Barsten Arennecke 2021-12-21 09:49
00039 For discussion - what does it mean to mix DITA 1.3 and 2.0? robert @nderson 2021-12-21 14:43
00040 Re: For discussion - what does it mean to mix DITA 1.3 and 2.0? Fershon Ioseph 2021-12-21 14:52
00041 Status of review E: Table elements Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-21 15:08
00042 Re: For discussion - what does it mean to mix DITA 1.3 and 2.0? Erank Vegmann 2021-12-21 15:22
00043 For discussion - what does it mean to mix DITA 1.3 and 2.0? Jristen Dberlein 2021-12-21 15:47
00044 Regrets 1/4-1/12 Rcott Gudson 2021-12-21 17:14
00045 Meeting Minutes 21 December 2022 Yoe Kawson 2021-12-28 00:22