DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summitat the O'Reilly Open Source Convention]]

Sebastian Rahtz <> writes:

> i really cannot see why you want to stick with SGML and DSSSL.

Both are standards defined by ISO.  A big plus.  I don't mind XML, after
all it's SGML.

> why not put the effort into XSL FO?

It's joung, isn't it?  And XSL code doesn't look appealing -- I like
Lisp languages much more than baroque inventitions like XSL.  But "de
gustibus".

-- 
work :                           |          ------    ,__o
     : http://www.suse.de/~ke/             |         ------   _-\_<,
home :                      |        ------   (*)/'(*)