> > i really cannot see why you want to stick with SGML and DSSSL.
>
> Both are standards defined by ISO. A big plus. I don't mind XML, after
> all it's SGML.
XSL is written in XML :-}
but seriously, who follows ISO standards in this area?
> > why not put the effort into XSL FO?
>
> It's joung, isn't it?
but growing. unlike DSSSL
> And XSL code doesn't look appealing -- I like
> Lisp languages much more than baroque inventitions like XSL. But "de
> gustibus".
i suspect you are in a minority :-}
sebastian
