On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:26:46PM +0200, Joachim Ziegler wrote:
> I'm just wondering why a (inline) glossterm without a linkend gets
> special typographical treatment in HTML and FO output whereas one with a
> linkend gets not. (?)
I see this problem on the FO side, but the HTML side is all
italic as far as I can see. Can you give an example
of a file where the HTML inlines are different?
I think the FO side is a bug, since all other cases for
inline glossterm use the 'inline.italseq' template,
except that one that uses 'inline.charseq'.
--
Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street
Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796
The SCO Group fax: (831) 429-1887
email:
