I don't think there is a reason. It would seem that the keep-together PI
should also be made to work in informal objects such as informalexample.
You can file a bug report on the DocBook SourceForge site about this.
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=27830&group_id=21935
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerd v. Egidy" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 10:08 AM
Subject: [docbook-apps] dbfo keep-together for informal objects?
> Hi,
>
> I want to make sure that some special <para>s are kept together on one
page
> for print output.
>
> I've seen that the dbfo keep-together PI is used for that. It works well
if
> you put a formal object like <example> around the paras. But because I
just
> want to group those paras and not add a title and an example number in
front
> of it I can not use it.
>
> It seems like keep-together is just supported for formal objects, not for
> informal ones. Is there any reason behind this?
>
> How can I keep my paras together without using hacks like hard page
breaks?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Gerd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
>
>
