FWIW, I
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Stayton [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 1:27 PM
> To: Gerd v. Egidy;
> Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] dbfo keep-together for informal objects?
>
> I don't think there is a reason. It would seem that the keep-together
PI
> should also be made to work in informal objects such as
informalexample.
> You can file a bug report on the DocBook SourceForge site about this.
>
>
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=27830&group_id=21935
>
> Bob Stayton
> Sagehill Enterprises
> DocBook Consulting
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gerd v. Egidy" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 10:08 AM
> Subject: [docbook-apps] dbfo keep-together for informal objects?
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to make sure that some special <para>s are kept together on
one
> page
> > for print output.
> >
> > I've seen that the dbfo keep-together PI is used for that. It works
well
> if
> > you put a formal object like <example> around the paras. But because
I
> just
> > want to group those paras and not add a title and an example number
in
> front
> > of it I can not use it.
> >
> > It seems like keep-together is just supported for formal objects,
not
> for
> > informal ones. Is there any reason behind this?
> >
> > How can I keep my paras together without using hacks like hard page
> breaks?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Gerd
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
