Re: [docbook] Problem with fop and fop.extension

Oops...need to send to the list.

Glen


Glen Mazza wrote:
> Petr Hracek wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> during the fop operations I have received following exception
>> Exception
>> javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: 
>> org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException: 
>> file:///home/cz2b10q6/Documents/DocBooks/DenikZaslOtce/DenikZaslOtce.fo:2:24488: 
>> Error(2/24488): No element mapping definition found for fox:outline
>>
>> Can you tell me which element I have to mapped?
>>
>> regards
>> Petr
>>
> 
> Best to stay with FOP 0.20.5.  If you are using fop 0.91, fox:outline 
> does not exist, as the new version uses the new XSL 1.1 bookmarks 
> instead.  I don't believe there is a port yet in Docbook to the new 
> version of FOP, also, the fox:destination is still unimplemented in 0.91.
> 
> fox:outline had a very messy content model (basically, you could place 
> it anywhere), making rigorous XSL input validation very difficult.  FOP 
> 0.91, OTOH, enforces the content model for the XSL 1.1 bookmarks per the 
> XSL candidate recommendation, allowing for input validation to be much 
> more solid.
> 
> [Incidentally, if someone could tell me why there is no equivalent to 
> fox:destination (PDF anchors) in XSL 1.1, I would *love* to know.  The 
> XSL Working Group implemented bookmarks in 1.1--obviating fox:bookmark, 
> fox:outline--but not fox:destination, causing me to think there is 
> actually no need for it, and that the commercial FO processors are doing 
> something else to create PDF anchors.]
> 
> Glen
>