Florent Georges wrote:
> If I am right, even with version="1.0", Saxon 9 should recognize
> xsl:result-document. But is it really Saxon 9? I would test it for
> real with something like:
>
> <xsl:template match="/">
> <info>
> <version info="{ system-property('xsl:version') }"/>
> <vendor info="{ system-property('xsl:vendor') }"/>
> <vendor-url info="{ system-property('xsl:vendor-url') }"/>
> </info>
> </xsl:template>
>
> (maybe added in the original stylesheet, using xsl:comment to put this
> info in a comment in the original output, using exactly the same system
> to run the transform).
>
> JAXP is not always giving you the processor implementation you think
> it would ;-)
That would be a nice piece of debug information to add either way?
Especially as docbook moves towards v5 and xslt 2.0
Very useful for this list at least!
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
