Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [ebxml-jc] an update

From
Breininger, Kathryn R <>
Date
2004-09-23T15:36:12+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ebxml-jc] an update
Title: Message

Jacques,

I was 
a little unclear on the discussion list so want to try to clarify what I was 
thinking.  I believe we should request Karl set up the discussion list so 
that it can be made publicly available with a call for participation.  This 
will also provide broad visibility of the discussion list, and hopefully pull in 
additional people.  Of course Matt (who offered to lead the discussion 
list) and the names listed below would be subscribed to the list once 
it is set up.  Additionally, Karl would be posting the list and call for 
participation to the OASIS membership, and we could forward the call for 
participation to ebXML-dev and other lists as 
appropriate. 

 

Here 
is the section on OASIS discussion lists - seems a very simple and straight 
forward process!

 

(a). TC Discussion Lists

Any group of at least three Eligible Persons shall be authorized to begin a 
publicly subscribable discussion list for the purpose of forming a TC by 
submitting to OASIS TC Administration the following items:

  
The name of the discussion list, which shall not be the same as the name 
  of the list in which the TC itself will operate once formed; 
  
A preliminary statement of scope for the TC that the list is intended to 
  form; 
  
The names, electronic mail addresses, and membership affiliations of the 
  Eligible Persons proposing to create the discussion list; and 
  
The name of the discussion list leader. 

No later than 15 days following the submission, OASIS TC Administration shall 
provide these materials to the membership with a Call For Participation in a 
discussion list whose purpose is to form the TC described in the application. 
Discussion of TC formation shall begin on the list no sooner than seven days 
after the announcement. More than one TC can be formed from a discussion list. A 
list established to discuss the formation of a TC under provisions of this 
section shall automatically go out of existence 90 days after the call for 
participation, together with its archive.

We have the first two items 
done, item 3 would be the JC members, and item 4 would be 
Matt. 

 

Was 
this what you had in mind as well?

Kathryn

 

  

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Jacques Durand 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 
  1:50 PM
To: ''
Subject: 
  [ebxml-jc] an update

  
Quick update on the call today (restating minutes): 
  

  
- we have given homework to everyone who did not complain 
  (including absentees  ;-) 

  
1. White paper: 

  
we'd like to see a rough outline (bullet list of what 
  would be developed in each part of the paper) by next meeting (October 
  6).

  
That is not too hard a first step: takes between 30mn and 
  1h for each assignee. 

  
See the current structure of the paper below, which is 
  still flexible. 
Parts have beem (partially) 
  assigned as follows. 

  
1. ebXML: the Requirements, the Approach 
  (TBD, thinking of a marketing team member, David Webber?) 
2. Messaging (preferred: Ian - can reuse one of your presentations 
  material? someone from MS TC can assist here too) 
3. Business Transactions and 
  Collaborations (Monica/Dale) 
4. 
  Collaboration Protocol Agreements (Dale) 
5. The Registry-Repository (Kathryn) 
6. Standardizing COntent (Jon Bosak?) 
  
7. Testing ebXML (Jacques) 
  
8. Deploying ebXML in a SOA environment 
  (Matt) 
9. Who deploys ebXML today 
  (a marketing person may consolidate and edit the input we provide) 
  

  
2. ebXML Adoption discussion list: 

  
I propose we create this list asap with participants 
  below 
(at same time we are considering broadening 
  the sending of the invite to ebxml-mktg / ebxml-dev. Any opinion on 
  this?) 

  
- members of JC (let us know if you don't) 
  
- Joe Speed () 
- Lisa Schiltz 
  () 
- Dick 
  Brooks () 
- Patrick 
  Hogan () 
  
- David Webber () 
- 
  OASIS management (Carol? other?) 

  
Regards, 

  
Jacques 

  
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
  
ebXML White Paper Synopsis 
  
========================== 

  
NOTES: 
- the audience is "technical executive", say CTO and IT management, 
  since they are decision makers on 
adopting ebXML. Yet the style should resonate with vertical users with 
  a B2B experience (e.g. EDI). 
- 
  also, for those already familiar with ebXML, the paper should give a feel of 
  the future version. 
- Each section 
  would average 3-5 pages (overall paper between 30-50 pages, including 
  figures). 
Sections don't have to 
  give an exhaustive view of the material referred to, nor a balanced 
  summary, 
but should convey the 
  rationale behind it, and may focus on a few remarkable features. 
  
Each section could include a short FAQ at 
  the end. 
- The outline below is 
  rather classic, in breaking down by component. It could be different: 
  describe 
first the ISO version, 
  then separately the future version (But the latter is too unstable today to 
  deserve 
a full section.) Or, could 
  downplay the components and focus more on the integrated view, how 
  everything 
works together, giving 
  away features details while unwinding scenarios & use cases. I though it 
  would 
be sufficient to have Section 
  1 do a bit of this binding-it-all-together job. 
- we could involve marketing team to do Section 
  #9. 

  
1. ebXML: the Requirements, the Approach 
  

  
- short definition: an ISO standard for 
  Exchanging business messages, Conducting trading relationships, 
  
Defining and registering business 
  processes, Communicating data in common terms, Assembling business 
  transactions. 
- the business case 
  (EDI-compatible in both content and architecture, accessible to SMEs, 
  non-managed env., 
covering all 
  partners of a supply chain, XML-based) 
- an integrated approach of B2B focusing on interoperability needs, yet 
  loose coupling with back-end systems. 
- transitioning to ebXML (migration path) 
- anatomy of an ebXML deployment (showing 
  architecture, the interaction steps in usage scenarios) 

  
2. Messaging 

  
- Overview of current version 
  
(requirements & design 
  principles, summary of salient features, some use cases, relationship with 
  other ebXML parts) 
(this has to be 
  described in a creative way: not a tech report,  but rationale and 
  differentiation with what 
exists 
  outside) 
- the roadmap: what is 
  next, the new requirements. (Web services protocols, payload services, richer 
  MEPs...) 

  
3. Business Transactions and 
  Collaborations 

  
- Overview of current version 
  
(requirements & design 
  principles, summary of salient features, use case, relationship with other 
  ebXML parts) 
- the roadmap: what is 
  next, the new requirements. 

  
4. Collaboration Protocol Agreements 
  

  
- Overview of current version 
  
(requirements & design 
  principles, summary of salient features, use case, relationship with other 
  ebXML parts) 
- the roadmap: what is 
  next, the new requirements. 

  
5. The Registry-Repository 

  
- Overview of current version 
  
(requirements & design 
  principles, summary of salient features, use case, relationship with other 
  ebXML parts) 
- the roadmap: what is 
  next, the new requirements. 

  
6. Standardizing COntent 

  
- Core components (requirements & 
  design principles, summary of salient features) 
- UBL 

  
7. Testing ebXML 

  
- Summary of Interop tests in US, Asia, 
  Europe. 
- the role of IIC, test 
  suites and test framework. 

  
8. Deploying ebXML in a SOA 
  environment 
- where ebXML fits in 
  (example arch from GM) 
- pilot 
  projects (AIAG...) 

  
9. Who deploys ebXML 
- survey 
- what do people do with ebXML, value they see.
Next in thread → Next in month →