Re: [ebxml-msg] LZJU90 Compressed Encoding

From
William J. Kammerer <>
Date
2003-01-11T19:07:34+00:00
ID
272401c2b9a4$602d6cc0$97e41840@oemcomputer
Thread
Re: [ebxml-msg] LZJU90 Compressed Encoding
Sounds fascinating.  Let us know if you find out more.  But I would
think it really isn't necessary anymore considering that ZIP is such a
ubiquitous format - a BASE64 encoded ZIPped attachment serves the same
purpose, doesn't it?

William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859
+1 (614) 487-0320

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew MacKenzie" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, 11 January, 2003 01:33 PM
Subject: [ebxml-msg] LZJU90 Compressed Encoding



Has anyone heard of LZJU90? I came across it while trying to figure out
ways to slim ebXML messages down to a size that would be more manageable
in high volume deployments while still retaining the ability to use
SMTP.

I see no implementations other than in C.

http://www.zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC1505/Output/chapter5.html

-Matt