[FWD: [ebxml-msg-comment] Public Comment]

By a miracle I did not think this was SPAM.

 

Can someone please respond to Ronald on this?

 

Thanks, DW

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
[ebxml-msg-comment] Public Comment
From:

Date: Sat, July 01, 2006 6:45 pm
To:


Comment from:


Name: Ronald van Kuijk
Title: IT
Architect
Organization: Private interest
Regarding Specification:
ebMS 3.0 Public Review Draft 1

A few things that caught my
attention trying to use the xsd with xmlbeans and reading the
docs:
- The response example message in 5.3.1 has the
collaborationInfo in the wrong place (line 1520-1524)
- the
mustunderstand and version on the message element are in the same
namespace according to the  xsd but in different ones according to
the docs
- in the ebMS Header example (line 1151) contains a PartInfo
element with a scheme and description element. These are *not* in the
schema in the same  document. In 5.2.1.13 there is information
that it is allowed to use these elements in the same namespace
- in
the example in 5.2.1.3 and the docs of 5.2.1.4 there is a reference to
a type attribute. This attribute is not in the docs (PartyId is not an
xmltype)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional
commands, e-mail: