Fwd: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23 call

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















emergency-if message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Fwd: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23 call




From: Art Botterell <>
To: 
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:56:34 -0700






Friends -

FYI re some requirements / drafting work being done under DHS and EIC 
auspices.  This particular item is being fast-tracked to a draft for 
an exercise next month... so by the time it comes around as a 
submission to the TC it'll have at least a first round of testing 
along with a pretty broad stakeholder base.

- Art

>To: 
>From: Art Botterell <>
>Subject: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23 call
>Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:34:38 -0700
>
>Friends -
>
>Thanks to all who worked so hard on our call earlier today, and to 
>those who've offered inputs by email and offline conversations.  I'm 
>attaching a redraft incorporating our discussions from today, in the 
>course of which it seems like we reached pretty good closure (for a 
>first round, anyway) on the overall "wrapper" message structure and 
>on Tables 1-3 of the specifics.
>
>As discussed on the call, we're going to try to resolve Tables 4 
>(agency types) and 5 (response types) in the course of this week via 
>this email list.  If you have specific suggestions for adds, edits 
>or deletes, please post them to this list (<>) 
>ASAP. In the interests of time I'd encourage all of us to refrain 
>from philosophical or general comments unless they're accompanied by 
>specific and actionable suggestions.
>
>Also, please note that, in the interests of net.hygene, attachments 
>may only be sent to the list by special arrangement... so please 
>make any comments and suggestions in your email text, not in a 
>"red-lined" copy of the draft.
>
>I'll also be posting this file to our Knowledge Center on DisasterHelp.gov.
>
>Again, thanks to each of you for all your hard work and insight, and 
>for demonstrating how much we can accomplish together when the chips 
>are down!
>
>- Art
>
>