Re: [emergency-if] Fwd: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23call

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















emergency-if message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [emergency-if] Fwd: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23call




From: Kon Wilms <>
To: Art Botterell <>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:26:23 -0700






My question is, what is the point of having the IF group even look at 
this if it is already 'cooked'? Seems rather pointless and defeats the 
purpose of a standards group, i.e. set standard -> implement standard, 
or maybe I am missing something...

Cheers
Kon

Art Botterell wrote:
> Friends -
> 
> FYI re some requirements / drafting work being done under DHS and EIC 
> auspices.  This particular item is being fast-tracked to a draft for an 
> exercise next month... so by the time it comes around as a submission to 
> the TC it'll have at least a first round of testing along with a pretty 
> broad stakeholder base.
> 
> - Art
> 
>> To: 
>> From: Art Botterell <>
>> Subject: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23 call
>> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:34:38 -0700
>>
>> Friends -
>>
>> Thanks to all who worked so hard on our call earlier today, and to 
>> those who've offered inputs by email and offline conversations.  I'm 
>> attaching a redraft incorporating our discussions from today, in the 
>> course of which it seems like we reached pretty good closure (for a 
>> first round, anyway) on the overall "wrapper" message structure and on 
>> Tables 1-3 of the specifics.
>>
>> As discussed on the call, we're going to try to resolve Tables 4 
>> (agency types) and 5 (response types) in the course of this week via 
>> this email list.  If you have specific suggestions for adds, edits or 
>> deletes, please post them to this list (<>) ASAP. In 
>> the interests of time I'd encourage all of us to refrain from 
>> philosophical or general comments unless they're accompanied by 
>> specific and actionable suggestions.
>>
>> Also, please note that, in the interests of net.hygene, attachments 
>> may only be sent to the list by special arrangement... so please make 
>> any comments and suggestions in your email text, not in a "red-lined" 
>> copy of the draft.
>>
>> I'll also be posting this file to our Knowledge Center on 
>> DisasterHelp.gov.
>>
>> Again, thanks to each of you for all your hard work and insight, and 
>> for demonstrating how much we can accomplish together when the chips 
>> are down!
>>
>> - Art
>>
>>