Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [emergency-if] Fwd: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23 call

From
Art Botterell
Date
2004-08-24T15:39:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [emergency-if] Fwd: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23 call
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















emergency-if message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [emergency-if] Fwd: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23 call




From: Art Botterell <>
To: 
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:26:20 -0700






Pretty common, I think, for a proposal to be brought into the OASIS 
process already reasonably well-formed.  CAP, for example, already 
had two years of working group activity and two rounds of field 
trials behind it before it came into the TC.  One key reason is that 
we're a "technical committee"... our strength is in the technical 
aspects, but we have less depth in the operational / business process 
and user requirements, so for that we turn to the practitioner 
community.

In any event, I passed this to the IF team not for standardization 
but just for information about an ongoing activity that might help 
focus some of our conversations.

- Art


At 1:26 AM -0700 8/24/04, Kon Wilms wrote:
>My question is, what is the point of having the IF group even look 
>at this if it is already 'cooked'? Seems rather pointless and 
>defeats the purpose of a standards group, i.e. set standard -> 
>implement standard, or maybe I am missing something...
>
>Cheers
>Kon
Next in thread → Next in month →