| =?UTF-8?B?R3JvdXBzIC0gRXZlbnQgIklGIFdlZWts?= =?UTF-8?B?eSBNZWV0aW5nIiBtb2RpZmllZA==?= |
2 |
2012-03-06 |
| [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (EMFW-21) DE 2.0 No default lists for confidentiality, senderRole, recipientRole? |
2 |
2012-03-06 |
| [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (EMFW-20) DE 2.0 Allow XML Comments |
1 |
2012-03-06 |
| [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (EMFW-19) DE 2.0 It would be helpful to state that it is RECOMMENDED that any sys that can store-and-forward message preserve the element order, and those systems whose primary role is to store-and-forward msg MUST preserve the element order. This would suppor |
1 |
2012-03-06 |
| [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (EMFW-18) DE 2.0 Cleanup of How Defaults are Explained in the Spec |
1 |
2012-03-06 |
| [OASIS Issue Tracker] Issue Comment Edited: (EMFW-21) DE 2.0 No default lists for confidentiality, senderRole, recipientRole? |
2 |
2012-03-06 |
| =?UTF-8?B?R3JvdXBzIC0gRFJBRlQtMDMtMDYtMTIt?= =?UTF-8?B?TWludXRlcy1JRi1TdWJjb21taXR0ZWUu?= =?UTF-8?B?b2R0IHVwbG9hZGVk?= |
1 |
2012-03-13 |
| [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (EMFW-17) DE 2.0 Isuspect the XLink feature will solve the problem about how to tie related content objects &descriptions together, but what we have here as description is both repetitive (almost-the-same paragraph many times in Data Dictionary Comments) & opaque. |
2 |
2012-03-13 |
| [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (EMFW-16) DE 2.0 The "ct:" namespace is referenced long before it is defined (other than a page 7 ref to "EDXL-CT"). Consider moving some version of the content in section 3.2.10 to the beginning of the Data Dictionary. |
1 |
2012-03-13 |
| [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (EMFW-15) DE 2.0 What's the recommended way for a receiving system to distinguish between DE 1.0 and 2.0 messages, assuming a common input channel? |
1 |
2012-03-13 |
| [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (EMFW-14) DE 2.0 Signing - confirm any ## other is in the correct place for signing and encrypting |
2 |
2012-03-13 |
| [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (EMFW-13) DE 2.0 Signing - any ## other is missing from root element for signing |
1 |
2012-03-13 |
| =?UTF-8?B?R3JvdXBzIC0gRFJBRlQtMDMtMTMtMTIt?= =?UTF-8?B?TWludXRlcy1JRi1TdWJjb21taXR0ZWUu?= =?UTF-8?B?b2R0IHVwbG9hZGVk?= |
1 |
2012-03-20 |
| [OASIS Issue Tracker] Issue Comment Edited: (EMFW-3) DE 2.0 Schema Cleanup Issue- XLink -namespace collision |
1 |
2012-03-20 |
