← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Groups - DRAFT-04-03-12-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee-1.odt uploaded

From
Jeff Waters
Date
2012-04-10T07:42:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Groups - DRAFT-04-03-12-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee-1.odt uploaded
Submitter's message
Please review these minutes of the April 3rd, 2012 meeting of the Infrastructure Framework subcommittee for approval at our upcoming meeting, subject to any specified changes. Thanks.

--
Jeff Waters
Document Name :  DRAFT-04-03-12-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee-1.odt
Description
At the April 3rd, 2012 meeting of the Infrastructure Framework  Subcommittee, the members began reviewing proposed changes to the DE 2.0  designed to implement the resolutions addressing the public comments,  including the following topics:

 1.  TOPIC EMFW-21 Changes Made: Text Added to SenderRole and RecipientRole  data dictionary elements to suggest where example roles can be found; also
modified schema and examples to enable ?Classified? and ?Unclassified? as  defaults for confidentiality.
Members will review this week, approve at  our next meeting, and close out this issue, subject to any specified  changes.

 2.  TOPIC EMFW-20 NO Changes Required: The resolution was that no special  handling of comments is appropriate.  Members will review this week,  approve at our next meeting, and close out this issue, subject to any  specified changes.

 3.  TOPIC EMFW-19 NO Changes Required: The resolution was that no special  enforcement of element ordering is appropriate beyond what is already  enforced by XML Schema.  Members will review this week, approve at our next  meeting, and close out this issue, subject to any specified changes.

 4.  TOPIC EMFW-18 StatusKindDefault and StatusKindValueList were added to  the data dictionary and a new section 1.3.4 ?Value Lists and Defaults? was  added to the .odt version of the specification to provide a better  explanation upfront.  Members will review these changes this week, approve  at our next meeting, and close out this issue, subject to any specified  changes.

 5.  TOPIC: How should the elements in the data dictionary be ordered?  (Answer: Jeff suggested ordering alphabetically; however Rex noted that in  othe specifications the elements are grouped into sections and others  commented that ordering by the order in the XML Schema may be a better  order. Members will consider this ordering issue and recommend an ordering  approach at the next meeting.)
References:

 (1) JIRA DE 2.0 Issues List:  http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&pid=10084
  (2) Jeff's recent uploaded zip for Working Draft 06 containing mods to  specification and schema:  http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-if/download.php/45604/edxl-de-v2.0-csprd01-fixed.zip
Download Latest Revision
Public Download Link
Submitter : Jeff Waters
Group : EM Infrastructure Framework SC
Folder : Resources
Date submitted : 2012-04-10 00:41:24
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →