Groups - DR Programs (DR-Program-DRRC_20090914 SK edits.doc) uploaded

David,

I agree with the REST interface as well. Are you suggesting that
all messages should use the GET method? As you may already know, you could also
POST XML messages using REST. 

With kind regards,

********************************

Michel
Kohanim, C.E.O

Universal
Devices, Inc.

(p)
818.631.0333

(f) 
818.436.0702

http://www.universal-devices.com

********************************

From: Wilson, David C
(St. Paul) [mailto:]

Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 1:00 PM

To: 

Subject: RE: RE: [energyinterop] Groups - DR Programs
(DR-Program-DRRC_20090914 SK edits.doc) uploaded

As a specific example, I have an older product that has
Python 2.3.  To my definition, a simple client is one that is less than
200 LOC in Python 2.3 and uses SGML parsing.

I think a simple REST message is essential to low barrier
to entry.  As seen on Twitter (forwarded more for humor more than serious
consideration):

      Tim O'Reilly: @sramji in a
meeting: "The only reason you'd have only a SOAP API is because you hate
80% of your addressable market." REST FTW.

Regards,

Dave

Office: +1.651.407.4168

Mobile: +1.612.741.2759

Email: