As a question, was WS-I B 2.0 developed before or after 2.0? An request to use 1.1 could be a “don’t use that bug-ridden 1.0” or it could be “stay away from the mistakes of 2.0” or it could be “use the one that is current as of this pub date”
As a related note, the TAB in OASIS is examining specs to find cross-dependencies, and considering a means for recommended updates as standards advance.
tc
" It is the theory that decides what can be observed ." - Albert Einstein
Toby Considine
Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee
U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee
Facilities Technology Office University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC
Email:
Toby.Considine@ unc.edu
Phone: (919)962-9073
http://www.oasis-open.org
blog: www.NewDaedalus.com
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Pim van der Eijk Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 9:54 AM
To:
Subject: [energyinterop] WSDL version question
Hello,
Energy Interop wd 36 recommends conformance to WS-I Basic Profile 2.0. The WSDL version supported by the WS-I BP 2.0 (and by 1.2) is WSDL 1.1.
The WSDL documents in wd 36 use the http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl namespace which is the namespace of version 2.0 of WSDL rather than the WSDL 1.1 namespace, http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/ .
Would it not make sense to deliver WSDLs in the interoperable version covered by the WS-I profile that the EI specification references?
Pim
