Next in thread →
Next in month →
[OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-669) FSGIM Streams Compatibility
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=80704#comment-80704 ] William Cox commented on ENERGYINTEROP-669: ------------------------------------------- For consideration, the proposed text needs to be contributed to the Energy Interoperation Technical Committee. The simplest way is to email the relevant document(s) to after subscribing to that list. The Streams-related classes in the 2016 FSGIM model do not appear different from the WS-Calendar standard. There are no links provided, and locating "FSGIM User Guide" has not succeeded. We request that the commenter identify and provide relevant documents. > FSGIM Streams Compatibility > --------------------------- > > Key: ENERGYINTEROP-669 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-669 > Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: cts > Affects Versions: CTSPR01 > Environment: Steve Ray https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00005.html > Reporter: Toby Considine > Assignee: Toby Considine > Priority: Minor > Labels: ARCH-CONF > > Sections 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 (beginning at line 158) discuss conformance with WS-Calendar Streams and with FSGIM. It should be noted that FSGIM extended the idea of Streams beyond just a sequence of identical, contiguous intervals (as documented in the FSGIM User Guide, beginning at page 221). I would recommend that the CTS committee consider this more general specification, which supports the notion of Streams as well as other, less periodic sequences. > Steve Ray -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.3#803004)
Next in thread →
Next in month →