RE: [fwsi-comment] Public Comment

Hi Brian
Thanks for your comments on this. As the public review is now close, I
would like to respond to this suggestion of yours. Sorry if it seemed an
awfully long time ago.

We have discussed and evaluated your suggestion of incorporating
WS-Trust, and the TC is agreeable to your suggestion. As such the specs
will now be changed to include this as well.

Thank you for your suggestion. :-)

On Behalf of the Functional Elements SC of FWSI TC
-puaysiew-


-----Original Message-----
From:  [mailto:] 
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 3:08 AM
To: 
Subject: [fwsi-comment] Public Comment


Comment from: 

Name: Brian R. Carroll

Title: Serena Fellow

Organization: Seena Software

Regarding Specification: Functional Elements Specification, Committee
Draft 2.0



In section 2.5 Identity Management Functional Element, a choice of the
SAML protocols (SAML Request and SAML Response) seems to have been made.

While that is one viable option, the specification should also consider
the use of WS-Trust.

Ideally the two specs would converge, but in the meantime, the FWSI work
would be more useful and applicable if it acknowledged the fact that two
viable alternatives to perfrom the same functions existed.





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
For additional commands, e-mail: