RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Query and Response Specification - Ple aseReview by September 24t h

MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

legalxml-courtfiling message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]

Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Query and Response Specification - Ple	aseReview by September 24t	h

From: "Poindexter, Gary W" <>

To: "Rowley, Moira" <>,"''"<>

Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 20:37:48 -0500

Title: Query and Response Specification - Please Review by September 24th

Relatively minor questions and 
observations:

 

1:

"Wherever possible, the parameterName 
should coincide with the established elements and attributes of the LegalXML 
data dictionary and contain the same information"

 

Remove the "Wherever possible," 

 

2:

How about a Boolean parameter on the query to eliminate 
the query labels in the response. 

 

3:

Within a standard query why not allow the requested 
columns in the response? The columns would have to be applicable to the query 
(i.e. couldn't request charges within a getCaseActorRole).

 

gary