[[email protected]: Re: IDPF TC filed]

Gentle ping on the below. Should I post this to the charter comments list? Thanks!

-----

Forwarded message from "Michael S. Tsirkin" <>

-----
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 00:02:06 -0400
To: "Orr, Michael" <>
Subject: Re: IDPF TC filed
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>  On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 05:01:03PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 04:53:34AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 02:26:08AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 06:06:01PM +0000, Orr, Michael wrote: > > >
> Michael
> > > >  > > >
> My deadline is up, so I filed the IDPF Charter (sent you a copy). I am still > > >
> hopeful NVIDIA will join intime so we can add you during > > > >  > > >
> The charter-amendment period. > > > >  > > > >
> > > >  > > > > -- > > > >  > > >
> Michael Orr  NCNG Strategy & Roadmap Office
WW
Cell:
(669)265-5995 > > > >  > > >
> Note:  Dyslexic @Work. Please excuse my typos.
(Remember, Dyslexics are > > >
> teople, poo) > > > >  > > > >
> > >  > >
> Hi! > >
> I attempted to edit the document to comment there but the result is > >
> unsatisfactory, with the proposal split mid-word, and truncated. > >
> Afterwards I was also unable to remove the comment there. I did not > >
> realize the changes will be persistent without clicking "save". Sorry > >
> about that. > > >  > >
> So I would like to propose adding the following to the Statement of Purpose: >
> So the final proposal would be this: >  >
>  	This project aims to complement rather than supplant the work of
> 	the Virtual IO Device (VirtIO)

OASIS TC, providing for accelerated
>  	development by focusing exclusively on PCI Express hardware
>  	implementations and on the networking functionality. >
>  	While promoting VirtIO is not one of the purposes of this
>  	project, this project aims to allow reuse of all or parts of the IDPF
>  	TC deliverables by the VirtIO TC as applicable. >
>  	To facilitate and promote cooperation between the two projects, a
> 	representative of each IDPF TC member will join the Virtio TC in
>  	a (voting or non-voting) member status. >
> 	Contributors of material comments will also be
>  	encouraged to cross-post their comments to the Virtio TC
> 	comments mailing list. >  >
> Makes sense? What's the process to propose this?  Hi Michael, Still waiting for your answer on this - I'd like this resolved so there's no conflict with virtio and I can join the IDPF TC. Should I submit the change proposal through the public review capability now?  > --
> MST

-----

End forwarded message

-----