Re: [oaxal-comment] OAXAL conformance

Hi Rodolfo,

Thank you for your feedback. The conformance clause is currently being 
reworked and will be hopefully more clear. The variants to the complete 
OAXAL stack will be defined in the 'Best Practices' document which will 
be produced once the Reference Document has been approved. We will keep 
you informed of progress.

Best Regards,

AZ

Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
> What standards must an OAXAL conformant authoring/localization
> implementation use?
>
> The conformance clause says that "key" components should be used, but
> it is not specific enough.
>
> For example, would a process that supports localization of DITA
> projects using SRX, TMX and XLIFF be considered OAXAL conformant?
>
> Regards,
> Rodolfo
>   

-- 
email - 
smail - c/o Mr. A.Zydron
	PO Box 2167
        Gerrards Cross
        Bucks SL9 8XF
	United Kingdom
Mobile +(44) 7966 477 181
FAX    +(44) 1753 480 465
www - http://www.xml-intl.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for
the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you may not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore does not
accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If verification
is required please request a hard-copy version. Unless explicitly stated
otherwise this message is provided for informational purposes only and
should not be construed as a solicitation or offer.