Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [obix] pre-meeting comments - version & retrievalDate

From
William Cox <>
Date
2014-09-18T19:18:08+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [obix] pre-meeting comments - version & retrievalDate
Notes interleaved.

      

      Thanks!

      

      bill

      --

      
William Cox
        

        Email: 
        

        Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
        

        +1 862 485 3696 mobile
        

        

      

      On 9/18/14 1:59 PM, Gemmill, Craig wrote:

    

    
      
      
      
      
      

        
Ok
            – that is what my original example had – I took out the dual
            specification based on my (apparently incorrect)
            interpretation of the call last week.  I will replace the
            example with both specified, to reinforce the notion that
            one is required, both are allowed.

        
 

        
Also- 
            for the time of retrieval attribute name:

        
 

        
retrievalDate

        
retrievalTime

        
retrievedOn

        
retrievedAt

      

    
    retrieved

    
      

        

        
 

        
And
            should we stick with requiring abstime?  The exact time
            seems unlikely to be important, but abstime seems a more
            common data primitive than date, since date is a 1.1
            construct in OBIX.

      

    
    abstime is an ISO 8501 "zulu" time, as I recall. That's fine - and
    unambiguous.  If you just want date, fine, but what about the date
    the spec changed?

    

    So I recommend dateTime or equivalent, which seems to be abstime.

    
      

        

        
 

        
 

        
 

        
 

        

          

            
From:
                Considine, Toby [mailto:]
                

                Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 1:50 PM

                To: Gemmill, Craig; William Cox; Obix TC List

                Subject: RE: [obix] My pre-meeting comments, with
                some post-meeting notes

          

        

        
 

        
My
            understanding, as a conformance issue, is that it is
            mandatory to have at least one (formal rev or retrieval
            time) but optional to have both.

        
 

        
tc

        
 

        

          

              
            

          
“The
              single biggest problem in communication is the illusion
              that it has taken place.”
            

          
–
              George Bernard Shaw.

          

              
            

          
            
              

                
                  
Toby
                      Considine

                      TC9, Inc

                  
OASIS
                      TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar

                  
OASIS
                      TC Editor: EMIX, Energy Interoperation

                  
SGIP
                      Smart Grid Architecture Committee

                
                
                  
  

                
                
                  
Email:
                      
                        

                      Phone: (919)619-2104

                  
http://www.tcnine.com

                      blog: http://www.NewDaedalus.com
                      

                
              

            
          
        

        
 

        

          

            
From:
                
                [mailto:]
                On Behalf Of Gemmill, Craig

                Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 1:45 PM

                To: William Cox; Obix TC List

                Subject: RE: [obix] My pre-meeting comments, with
                some post-meeting notes

          

        

        
 

        
Bill-

        
 

        
On
            your comment about line 769, it looks as though you are
            suggesting that the retrieval time be included EVEN IF the
            version information is also available.  This is different
            than my understanding of our intent, which was retrievalDate
            exists ONLY if version info is NOT available.

        
 

        
Just
            throwing this out for others to weigh in.

        
 

        
Craig

        
 

        
 

        

          

            
From:
                
                [mailto:]
                On Behalf Of William Cox

                Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:15 PM

                To: Obix TC List

                Subject: [obix] My pre-meeting comments, with
                some post-meeting notes

          

        

        
 

        
Attached to this message as .rtf.

          

          Thanks!

          

          bill

        

          
-- 

            William Cox 

            Email: 
            

            Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
            

            +1 862 485 3696 mobile
Next in thread → Next in month →