Latest/This Version URI for Schema/WSDL files

Go, Jeff, go.....    !!

I'm always in favour of chairs making
bold & fast decisions - if people disagree, they will let you know
pretty fast, in my experience....

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:  

Jeff Mischkinsky <>

25/03/2008 20:27

To

Sanjay Patil <>

cc



Subject

Re: [opencsa-liaison] Latest/This Version
URI for Schema/WSDL files

hi all,

   I'm fine with this too, so i think this makes everyone. Do we need
 

a formal kavi ballot or is 7 emails in affirmation enough?

   Actually.. to avoid another 7 emails, if my co-chair concurs i
 

think we can assume silence as no objection to unanimous consent.

     otherwise he can start a kavi ballot :-)

     -jeff

On Mar 25, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Anish Karmarkar wrote:

> Michael,

>

> Since we are the liaison reps from binding, were we (or was I)  

> supposed to do this?

>

> -Anish

> --

>

> Michael Rowley wrote:

>> +1

>> I don't think a meeting is necessary for this one, but I believe
that

>> the binding TC was looking for input from the Liason committee
 

>> regarding

>> whether or not the bindings should be in the SCA namespace, a
binding

>> specific namespace, or both.  I thought that someone from
Bindings  

>> was

>> going to be formally asking the Liason committee to provide a

>> recommendation on that.

>> Michael

>>