I cannot attend the meeting (out on vacation this week), but here are my votes on the issues noted in the agenda:
issue 23 - Should a ServiceProviderCatalog or ServiceProvider be an LDPC?
Nick: +1 for the current proposal.
issue 29 - Allow for selection dialogs for service providers
Nick: +1 for the current proposal.
issue 9 - Bootstrapping discovery
Nick: 0 (not really against this, but not convinced it's of great value)
issue 15 - Allow client to request different icon sizes for resource preview
Nick: +1 for the proposal with the change suggested by me in comment https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-15?focusedCommentId=60556&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-60556
issue 20 - Service provider should describe domain/scope
Nick: -1 on the proposal as currently written, +1 on the wording provided by David - see my comments in the issue.
Because I have been out this week and last week, I have not yet addressed my action item of writing up a scenario for how to determine the usage of a particular LDPC.
Nick.
"Sarabura, Martin" ---08/18/2015 09:31:47 AM---There are a few issues that Jim and I feel are close to ready for a vote; they are listed on the age
From: "Sarabura, Martin" <>
To: "OASIS ()" <>
Date: 08/18/2015 09:31 AM
Subject: [oslc-core] Agenda for this week's OSLC CORE TC meeting
Sent by: <>
There are a few issues that Jim and I feel are close to ready for a vote; they are listed on the agenda:
https://wiki.oasis-open.org/oslc-core/Meetings/Telecon2015.08.20
Please review these issues to help prepare for the meeting on Thursday.
Regards,
Martin Sarabura
R&D Fellow, PTC
