[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60558#comment-60558 ]
Nick Crossley commented on OSLCCORE-20:
---------------------------------------
The proposal made by David in the preceding comments is more generic and appropriate for an OSLC standard than the current proposal text, which mentions 'Jazz' and 'project areas'. I believe the latter is far too vendor-specific and not appropriate in the standard. I do fully support extending the definition of oslc:details as worded by David.
> Service provider should describe domain/scope
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OSLCCORE-20
> URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-20
> Project: OASIS OSLC Lifecycle Integration Core (OSLC Core) TC
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: David Honey
> Assignee: James Amsden
> Labels: ready-for-vote
>
> OSLC 2.0 supports a service declaring a domain or scope using oslc:domain and oslc:usage. Jazz applications frequently declare a service provider for each project area. However, there is no standard way for a client to determine which service provider to use for a known project area.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)
