Duane,
I think it would be foolish indeed to think in terms of unseating
established products.
What makes sense is to show value + - a few things spring to
mind:
a) Registry is eBusiness focused - so feature set reflects that -
existing CMS are document-facing.
b) Federated features hold out possiblity of federating a CMS
as part of a collection of Registry.
c) Services such as CAM and eForms can strongly compliment
what a CMS has.
d) Classification scheme support, and say OWL based searching,
is another area where registry can collaborate with CMS.
DW.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Duane Nickull" <>
To: "Chiusano Joseph" <>
Cc: "Breininger Kathryn R" <>; "ebXML Regrep
(ebXML Regrep)" <>; "Collins Jeff"
<>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [regrep] Meeting agenda and reminder for ebXML Registry telecon
December 18th, 2003
> Joseph et al:
>
> I would like to definitely explore this discussion fully. I have been
> asked on more than one occasion if the ebXML RR competes directly with
> existing CMS's. I am not familiar with Documentum et al and do not have
> a good grasp.
>
> I believe this is an important aspect of our work.
>
> Duane Nickull
>
> --
> Senior Standards Strategist
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://www.adobe.com
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
