You should remove the RELAX NG formal semantics docs and the RELAX NG
schema for RELAX NG, since they are both superceded by the spec.
Can I suggest that for both the spec and the tutorial we use a dated
filename and then have a symlink from the dateless filename to the current
version?
We should also have a section on RELAX NG schemas that have been written by
various folks. Specifically:
XML Schema (from Jeni Tennison)
http://www.jenitennison.com/schema/xmlschema.rng
RDF (from Jonathan Borden)
http://www.openhealth.org/RDF/RDFSurfaceSyntax.html
XSLT, XHTML, RELAX Core (from me)
http://thaiopensource.com/relaxng/
In the tools section, we should mention the new Relaxer release that
supports a RELAX NG subset
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/reldeve/message/307
--On 09 July 2001 16:43 -0400 Norman Walsh <> wrote:
> I took a few minutes this afternoon to update the RELAX NG webpages:
>
> - Added links to recent minutes
> - Updated the issues list
> - Added the RELAX NG Specification
>
> (James, if you provide XML/XSL for the spec, I can put that up, too.)
>
> If I messed something up, please let me know :-)
>
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
> --
> | It is a folly to expect men to do all that
> XML Standards Engineer | they may reasonably be expected to
> Technology Dev. Group | do.--Archbishop Whately
> Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to:
>
>
