Re: Updated issue list

> How about this?
>
> 1.  Shall we add a shorthand for
> <grammar><include href="..."><start>..</start></include></grammar>?
>
> 2.  Shall we change the language syntax so that it becomes easier to
> avoid rereading external grammars?

Are these two separate issues? I thought the issue was

"Shall we change the language syntax by adding a shorthand for ... so that 
it becomes easier to avoid rereading external grammars?"

James