Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
relax-ng · July 2001 ·
13 messages
· back to month
| # |
Subject |
From |
Date |
| 00020 |
Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
Murata Makoto
|
2001-07-05 08:40 |
| 00023 |
re: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
David RR Webber
|
2001-07-05 14:53 |
| 00036 |
Re: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
James Clark
|
2001-07-09 02:00 |
| 00042 |
Re: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
Murata Makoto
|
2001-07-09 07:38 |
| 00048 |
Re: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
James Clark
|
2001-07-09 11:05 |
| 00054 |
Re: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
David RR Webber
|
2001-07-09 18:55 |
| 00064 |
Re: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
Murata Makoto
|
2001-07-10 00:34 |
| 00071 |
Re: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
Murata Makoto
|
2001-07-10 00:52 |
| 00074 |
Re: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
David RR Webber
|
2001-07-10 01:17 |
| 00079 |
Re: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
|
2001-07-10 02:22 |
| 00080 |
Re: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
David RR Webber
|
2001-07-10 02:49 |
| 00094 |
RE: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
Michael Fitzgerald
|
2001-07-10 16:22 |
| 00099 |
RE: Issue: are <optional>, <oneOrMore>, <zeroOrMore> verbose?
|
James Clark
|
2001-07-10 23:58 |
