Re: [relax-ng] RELAX NG 2.0 ideas

From
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <>
Date
2002-06-07T10:18:50+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [relax-ng] RELAX NG 2.0 ideas
On Fri, 07 Jun 2002 16:10:43 +0700
James Clark <> wrote:

> Here is a list of some ideas I would want to consider for 2.0. Most of these
> are things that we considered for 1.0 but decided to leave out. 

Hosoya-san suggested a restriction for ensuring closure under boolean operations.
An infinite-nameclass <attribute> is required to have <text/> as its content.
I am not completely happy about this, but have not reached a realistic restriction.
More about this, see page 6 and pages 22 thru 23 of our manuscript at:

http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~hahosoya/papers/attelm.ps

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <>