Re: [relax-ng] Compact Syntax conformance

James Clark scripsit:

> What is not clear to me is whether we also need to describe conformance for
> a translator from the compact syntax to the XML syntax:

I propose a two-part conformance statement, something like this:

A translator from compact syntax to XML syntax is conformant to this
specification if:

(a) it represents every annotation in the input by an appropriate
foreign attribute or element in accordance with the rules in Appendix A; and

(b) it represents every non-annotation in the input by generating RELAX NG
elements and attributes that are equivalent in effect to those specified
by the rules in Appendix A.

This will need tightening.

-- 
John Cowan <>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_