Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [relax-ng] Why annotations are allowed in <empty/> and not in<ref/>?

From
Norman Walsh <>
Date
2003-01-31T17:09:59+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [relax-ng] Why annotations are allowed in <empty/> and not in<ref/>?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ James Clark <> was heard to say:
|> Why are annotations allowed in some empty content elements (such as
|> "empty") and not in some othet (such as "ref" and "parentRef")?
|
| That was a bug, see
|
|   http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/errata/spec-errata.html
|
| (which should be linked to from
|
| http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/spec-20011203-errata.html
|
| as referenced from the spec (please fix this, Norm)).

Fix what? I just looked and both those URIs seem to return the correct
(same) document.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
    | Impatient people always arrive too
XML Standards Architect | late.--Jean Dutourd
Web Tech. and Standards |
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+Oq3TOyltUcwYWjsRAi2/AKCsNQURExVp19DE+b7jYaElLHA0gQCfeeqG
E5g2M+y+oYHl9UKl1+9W54U=
=9I/w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Next in thread → Next in month →