Makoto,
Norm gets my interest with item 3) - seeings that we are just finishing
OASIS CAM v1.1 - and we've long held thoughts of integrating RelaxNG
with CAM...would be an easy piece of gluing together - not much string
and angle-brackets needed...
Thanks, DW
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [relax-ng] Revising the charter
From: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <>
Date: Mon, November 06, 2006 10:42 am
To:
Norm,
Sounds nice to me. Long time ago, James made some suggestions.
They are still useful in creating a requirement document.
Cheers,
Makoto
> In order to start the discussion of what we might as a committee work on
> next, here is a list of things off the top of my head that we might
> conceivably address (note that I'm not necessarily advocating any of these):
>
> Non-XML syntax
>
> Language for specifying key/keyref constraints
>
> Mechanism for associating validation or other processing with an XML
> document
>
> Official test suite
>
> Finish the FAQ we started on
>
> Namespace-based modularity along the lines of RELAX Namespaces
>
> A simple datatype library
>
> A new version of RELAX NG that adds features (what?)
>
> Standardize a way of doing type-assignment with RELAX NG
--
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <>
