Re: [relax-ng] Revising the charter

Norm,

Sounds nice to me.  Long time ago, James made some suggestions.  
They are still useful in creating a requirement document.

Cheers,

Makoto


> In order to start the discussion of what we might as a committee work on
> next, here is a list of things off the top of my head that we might
> conceivably address (note that I'm not necessarily advocating any of these):
> 
> Non-XML syntax
> 
> Language for specifying key/keyref constraints
> 
> Mechanism for associating validation or other processing with an XML
> document
> 
> Official test suite
> 
> Finish the FAQ we started on
> 
> Namespace-based modularity along the lines of RELAX Namespaces
> 
> A simple datatype library
> 
> A new version of RELAX NG that adds features (what?)
> 
> Standardize a way of doing type-assignment with RELAX NG


-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <>