[Issue 8]: Updated wording for final sentence in 1st Paragraph Section 6.6

Folks,

Following the action item I took at
the Assembly meeting of July 22, here are the proposed updated words for
the final sentence of the 1st paragraph

of section 6.6:

Previously the words read:

"As a result, the SCA runtime MUST
raise an error if an included composite is not found within the same SCA
contribution as the including composite"

New proposed words:

"The SCA runtime MUST reject a
deployed composite and raise an error where that composite, or a composite
that it depends on, has an <include/> statement  

where the referenced included composite
is not found in the same SCA contribution as the including composite."

Note that the new words do not address
the question of timing of the rejection and error raising, as agreed on
the TC call - this issue will be dealt with separately,

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:  

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU